164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11725366)
1. [Diagnostic variability versus diagnostic errors in cytology].
Dalla Palma P
Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):593-5. PubMed ID: 11725366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Data control and quality of the human cytoscreening function.
Rodney MB
Health Lab Sci; 1972 Jul; 9(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 5045713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast--time for a re-think?
Carder PJ
Cytopathology; 2004 Dec; 15(6):336-7. PubMed ID: 15606369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mistakes in cytopathology.
Shane JJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Dec; 17(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 9407216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy in cervicovaginal cytology.
Koss LG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Dec; 117(12):1240-2. PubMed ID: 8250695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Letter: The false positive smear.
Rubio CA
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):212-3. PubMed ID: 49995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A perspective on modern quality control methods.
Hutchinson ML; Lapidus SN; Inhorn SL; Papillo J
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(4):837-41. PubMed ID: 8693909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring and reporting errors in surgical pathology. Lessons from gynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Mar; 115(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 11242788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blinded review of Papanicolaou smears.
Gill GW
Cancer; 2005 Apr; 105(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 15662699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality control in histopathology and diagnostic cytology.
Langley FA
Histopathology; 1978 Jan; 2(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 669588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in liquid-based cytology specimens.
Qureshi MN
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):582. PubMed ID: 16334042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Double slide viewing as a cytology quality improvement initiative.
Raab SS; Stone CH; Jensen CS; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Grzybicki DM; Vrbin CM; Ohori NP; Dahmoush L
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Apr; 125(4):526-33. PubMed ID: 16627263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Yorkshire slide exchange EQA scheme.
Mansour P; Walsh D; Immins E; Dutton J
Cytopathology; 1997 Feb; 8(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 9068960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrepancy rate in biopsy and cytology reports.
Elliott WG
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Mar; 105(3):371. PubMed ID: 8602620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Making the cut: what can be regularly and reliably identified in gynecologic cytology?
Renshaw AA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Mar; 34(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 16470865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How should adequacy of liquid-based cytology be defined?
Desai M; Herbert A
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 16879262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance cytology error tracking system for negative GYN case rescreen.
Maloney JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 May; 14(3):282-3. PubMed ID: 8732663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gynecological cytology: too old to be a pop star but too young to die.
Longatto-Filho A; Schmitt FC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):672-3. PubMed ID: 17854085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
