These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Bioanalytical methods for food allergy diagnosis, allergen detection and new allergen discovery. Gasilova N; Girault HH Bioanalysis; 2015; 7(9):1175-90. PubMed ID: 26039813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incurred sample reproducibility: what have we learned and how can we build on our learnings? Timmerman P Bioanalysis; 2018 Nov; 10(21):1707-1709. PubMed ID: 30421622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Secondary prevention: detection of the allergen. Karlberg AT; Gäfvert E Curr Probl Dermatol; 1996; 25():145-53. PubMed ID: 8787598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioanalysis of complex clinical samples - considerations on analytical variability: some thoughts to ponder. Srinivas NR Biomed Chromatogr; 2011 Jun; 25(6):734-6. PubMed ID: 21387352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of new laboratory tests]. Bolann BJ; Sandberg S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Feb; 123(3):337-9. PubMed ID: 12640904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A look back at the incurred sample reanalysis. Vazvaei F Bioanalysis; 2018 Nov; 10(21):1711-1713. PubMed ID: 30412679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Verification, validation and evaluation of analytical procedures in laboratory medicine. Haeckel R Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Jan; 42(1):111-2. PubMed ID: 15061393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures: a SFSTP proposal part IV. Examples of application. Hubert P; Nguyen-Huu JJ; Boulanger B; Chapuzet E; Cohen N; Compagnon PA; Dewé W; Feinberg M; Laurentie M; Mercier N; Muzard G; Valat L; Rozet E J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Nov; 48(3):760-71. PubMed ID: 18768284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-analytical errors: working with manufacturers to help improve quality. Daugherty K MLO Med Lab Obs; 2014 Feb; 46(2):18, 20. PubMed ID: 24672848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regional quality assurance for the 1980's, current status and future directions. Lawson NS; Haven GT; Ross JW Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Oct; 74(4 Suppl):552-9. PubMed ID: 7435447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioanalytical method validation: notable points in the 2009 draft EMA Guideline and differences with the 2001 FDA Guidance. Smith G Bioanalysis; 2010 May; 2(5):929-35. PubMed ID: 21083222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ensuring quality in genomic medicine: amid the rise in complex laboratory-developed tests, regulatory officials are seeking the right balance on quality assurance. Nelson B Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Dec; 122(12):855-6. PubMed ID: 25510938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Key elements of bioanalytical method validation for small molecules. Bansal S; DeStefano A AAPS J; 2007 Mar; 9(1):E109-14. PubMed ID: 17408234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative analyses of cadmium: quality assured? Brown SS IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (118):73-81. PubMed ID: 1303975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Journal Editors' requirements for full descriptions of laboratory methods need to include information on metrological traceability and analytical specificity. Middle JG Ann Clin Biochem; 2013 Jan; 50(Pt 1):87-8. PubMed ID: 23417445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]