316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11725662)
1. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
Agnihotry A; Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD007517. PubMed ID: 26954446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The integrity of bonded amalgam restorations: a clinical evaluation after five years.
Mach Z; Regent J; Staninec M; Mrklas L; Setcos JC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Apr; 133(4):460-7; quiz 493. PubMed ID: 11991463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years.
Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Watson RE; Garvan C; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 17473040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
Mahler DB; Engle JH
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive.
Belcher MA; Stewart GP
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Mar; 128(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 9066215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: a one-year evaluation.
Ahrari F; Nojoomian M; Moosavi H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):009-16. PubMed ID: 20978719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.
Collins CJ; Bryant RW; Hodge KL
J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 9611936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
