272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11725672)
1. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain.
Jost-Brinkmann PG; Böhme A
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 11725672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
Cacciafesta V; Süssenberger U; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Miethke RR
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 9633171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.
Cacciafesta V; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Süssenberger U; Miethke RR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 9563355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement to glazed porcelain.
Kitayama Y; Komori A; Nakahara R
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 12940567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of long-term water storage on the tensile strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cements.
Czochrowska E; Burzykowski T; Buyukyilmaz T; Ogaard B
J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(5):361-70. PubMed ID: 10546418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Speer C; Zimny D; Hopfenmueller W; Holtgrave EA
Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 16279832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of five different orthodontic bonding agents polymerized using halogen and light-emitting diode curing lights: an in vitro investigation.
Banerjee S; Banerjee R
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):731-2. PubMed ID: 22406726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive.
Prylińska-Czyżewska A; Maciejewska-Szaniec Z; Olszewska A; Polichnowska M; Grabarek BO; Dudek D; Sobański D; Czajka-Jakubowska A
Med Sci Monit; 2022 Dec; 28():e938867. PubMed ID: 36540003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Winchester LJ
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):293-305. PubMed ID: 1915618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
