216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11726043)
1. Hip simulator wear testing according to the newly introduced standard ISO 14242.
Kaddick C; Wimmer MA
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(5):429-42. PubMed ID: 11726043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro wear study of alumina-alumina total hip prostheses.
Smith SL; Unsworth A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 11726044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isolation and morphological characterisation of UHMWPE wear debris generated in vitro.
Affatato S; Fernandes B; Tucci A; Esposito L; Toni A
Biomaterials; 2001 Sep; 22(17):2325-31. PubMed ID: 11511029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear behaviour of cross-linked polyethylene assessed in vitro under severe conditions.
Affatato S; Bersaglia G; Rocchi M; Taddei P; Fagnano C; Toni A
Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(16):3259-67. PubMed ID: 15603821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The performance of gamma- and EtO-sterilised UHMWPE acetabular cups tested under severe simulator conditions. Part 2: wear particle characteristics with isolation protocols.
Affatato S; Bersaglia G; Emiliani D; Foltran I; Taddei P; Reggiani M; Ferrieri P; Toni A
Biomaterials; 2003 Oct; 24(22):4045-55. PubMed ID: 12834600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between gravimetric and volumetric techniques of wear measurement of UHMWPE acetabular cups against zirconia and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral heads in a hip simulator.
Smith SL; Unsworth A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1999; 213(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 10635696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements.
Goldsmith AA; Dowson D; Isaac GH; Lancaster JG
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 10718049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy as a Valuable Tool to Investigate the Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Wear Mechanisms and Debris in Hip Implants.
Schappo H; Gindri IM; Cubillos PO; Maru MM; Salmoria GV; Roesler CRM
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):258-262. PubMed ID: 28844766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wear characteristics of ceramic-on-ceramic for hip endoprostheses.
Früh HJ; Willmann G; Pfaff HG
Biomaterials; 1997 Jun; 18(12):873-6. PubMed ID: 9184751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear of conventional and cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished and roughened CoCr femoral heads in a biaxial hip simulator.
Saikko V; Calonius O; Keränen J
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(6):848-53. PubMed ID: 12418033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultra-low wear rates for rigid-on-rigid bearings in total hip replacements.
Clarke IC; Good V; Williams P; Schroeder D; Anissian L; Stark A; Oonishi H; Schuldies J; Gustafson G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(4):331-47. PubMed ID: 10997055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wear simulation of total hip prostheses with polyethylene against CoCr, alumina and diamond-like carbon.
Saikko V; Ahlroos T; Calonius O; Keränen J
Biomaterials; 2001 Jun; 22(12):1507-14. PubMed ID: 11374449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the size and morphology of UHMWPE wear debris produced by a hip joint simulator under serum and water lubricated conditions.
Wang A; Essner A; Stark C; Dumbleton JH
Biomaterials; 1996 May; 17(9):865-71. PubMed ID: 8718931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sliding on metallic and ceramic counterfaces representative of current femoral surfaces in joint replacement.
Lancaster JG; Dowson D; Isaac GH; Fisher J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 9141887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the wear and physical properties of silane cross-linked polyethylene and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.
Sakoda H; Voice AM; McEwen HM; Isaac GH; Hardaker C; Wroblewski BM; Fisher J
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):1018-23. PubMed ID: 11740757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wear of polyethylene acetabular cups against alumina femoral heads. 5 prostheses compared in a hip simulator for 35 million walking cycles.
Saikko VO
Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Oct; 64(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 8237313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microseparation and stripe wear in alumina-on-alumina hip implants.
Affatato S; Traina F; Toni A
Int J Artif Organs; 2011 Jun; 34(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 21725932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simplified motion and loading compared to physiological motion and loading in a hip joint simulator.
Smith SL; Unsworth A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10902437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups against surface-engineered femoral heads.
Galvin A; Brockett C; Williams S; Hatto P; Burton A; Isaac G; Stone M; Ingham E; Fisher J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Oct; 222(7):1073-80. PubMed ID: 19024155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a hip joint simulator.
Smith SL; Burgess IC; Unsworth A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1999; 213(6):469-73. PubMed ID: 10635695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
