285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11727003)
1. Liver transplantation: evolving patient selection criteria.
Yu AS; Ahmed A; Keeffe EB
Can J Gastroenterol; 2001 Nov; 15(11):729-38. PubMed ID: 11727003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient selection criteria for liver transplantation.
Yu AS; Keeffe EB
Minerva Chir; 2003 Oct; 58(5):635-48. PubMed ID: 14603144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient selection and listing policies for liver transplantation.
Keeffe EB
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1999 May; 14 Suppl():S42-7. PubMed ID: 10382638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: one region's experience.
Schaffer RL; Kulkarni S; Harper A; Millis JM; Cronin DC
Liver Transpl; 2003 Nov; 9(11):1211-5. PubMed ID: 14586883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolving trends in liver transplantation: listing and liver donor allocation.
Wiesner RH
Clin Liver Dis; 2014 Aug; 18(3):519-27. PubMed ID: 25017073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model for end-stage liver disease: did the new liver allocation policy affect waiting list mortality?
Austin MT; Poulose BK; Ray WA; Arbogast PG; Feurer ID; Pinson CW
Arch Surg; 2007 Nov; 142(11):1079-85. PubMed ID: 18025337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.
Trotter JF; Osgood MJ
JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1871-4. PubMed ID: 15100206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.
Pestana RC; Baracat EI; Massarollo PC; Pereira LA; Szutan LA
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2111-4. PubMed ID: 23747144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.
Wiesner RH; McDiarmid SV; Kamath PS; Edwards EB; Malinchoc M; Kremers WK; Krom RA; Kim WR
Liver Transpl; 2001 Jul; 7(7):567-80. PubMed ID: 11460223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Liver allocation: urgency of need or prospect of success? Ethical considerations.
Bobbert M; Ganten TM
Clin Transplant; 2013; 27 Suppl 25():34-9. PubMed ID: 23909500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a continuous disease severity score to the OPTN liver waiting list.
Edwards EB; Harper AM
Clin Transpl; 2001; ():19-24. PubMed ID: 12211782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.
Sharma P; Balan V; Hernandez JL; Harper AM; Edwards EB; Rodriguez-Luna H; Byrne T; Vargas HE; Mulligan D; Rakela J; Wiesner RH
Liver Transpl; 2004 Jan; 10(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 14755775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.
Coombes JM; Trotter JF
Clin Med Res; 2005 May; 3(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 16012126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimal criteria for placement of adults on the liver transplant waiting list: a report of a national conference organized by the American Society of Transplant Physicians and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Lucey MR; Brown KA; Everson GT; Fung JJ; Gish R; Keeffe EB; Kneteman NM; Lake JR; Martin P; McDiarmid SV; Rakela J; Shiffman ML; So SK; Wiesner RH
Liver Transpl Surg; 1997 Nov; 3(6):628-37. PubMed ID: 9404965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic analysis of liver allocation policies.
Howard DH
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 11475382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overview of the MELD score and the UNOS adult liver allocation system.
Martin AP; Bartels M; Hauss J; Fangmann J
Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3169-74. PubMed ID: 18089345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Waiting list removal rates among patients with chronic and malignant liver diseases.
Freeman RB; Edwards EB; Harper AM
Am J Transplant; 2006 Jun; 6(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 16686765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era.
Dutkowski P; Oberkofler CE; Slankamenac K; Puhan MA; Schadde E; Müllhaupt B; Geier A; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2011 Nov; 254(5):745-53; discussion 753. PubMed ID: 22042468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liver transplant recipient selection: MELD vs. clinical judgment.
Fink MA; Angus PW; Gow PJ; Berry SR; Wang BZ; Muralidharan V; Christophi C; Jones RM
Liver Transpl; 2005 Jun; 11(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 15915491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rescuing Prometheus: a policy proposal to alleviate excess demand for liver transplantation.
Ferguson ME; Ferguson RM
Clin Transplant; 1997 Feb; 11(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 9067695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
