267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11727275)
1. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance in cardiovascular medicine.
Willenheimer R
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2001; 44(3):155-67. PubMed ID: 11727275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
Jaillon P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matching the standards of clinical trial evidence with application in practice.
Sharpe N
Int J Clin Pract; 2002 Dec; 56(10):772-5. PubMed ID: 12510951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine: are we looking for statistical significance or clinical relevance?
Willenheimer R; Dahlöf B; Gordon A
Heart; 2000 Aug; 84(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10908243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The evidence provided by a single trial is less reliable than its statistical analysis suggests.
Borm GF; Lemmers O; Fransen J; Donders R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):711-715.e1. PubMed ID: 19171462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical versus clinical significance.
Wang HL; Greenwell H
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Dec; 21(6):542. PubMed ID: 11794564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.
Alexander KP; Newby LK; Armstrong PW; Cannon CP; Gibler WB; Rich MW; Van de Werf F; White HD; Weaver WD; Naylor MD; Gore JM; Krumholz HM; Ohman EM; ;
Circulation; 2007 May; 115(19):2570-89. PubMed ID: 17502591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of analysis by gender in the Cochrane reviews as related to treatment of cardiovascular disease.
Johnson SM; Karvonen CA; Phelps CL; Nader S; Sanborn BM
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Jun; 12(5):449-57. PubMed ID: 12869292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fewer mega-trials and more clinically oriented studies in hypertension research? The case of blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
Volpe M; Tocci G; Pagannone E
J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Apr; 17(4 Suppl 2):S36-43. PubMed ID: 16565245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiovascular clinical trials in Japan and controversies regarding prospective randomized open-label blinded end-point design.
Kohro T; Yamazaki T
Hypertens Res; 2009 Feb; 32(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 19262468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of the quality of clinical trials about therapeutic research using the standard of evidence-based medicine].
Chen F; Zeng YC; Wei HR
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 40(9):609-13. PubMed ID: 15500766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Tricks, devices, expedients and stratagems in the management and interpretation of cardiological trials].
Frea S; Bobbio M
G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2006 Nov; 7(11):761-7. PubMed ID: 17216918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials.
Appel LJ
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Nov; 1(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 17699370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: focus on clinical trials in cardiovascular diseases.
Lonn E
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2001; 10(6):497-508. PubMed ID: 11828831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S114-20. PubMed ID: 19007606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the quality of care for women with cardiovascular disease: report of a DCRI Think Tank, March 8 to 9, 2007.
Berger JS; Bairey-Merz CN; Redberg RF; Douglas PS;
Am Heart J; 2008 Nov; 156(5):816-25, 825.e1. PubMed ID: 19061693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
Liebeskind DS; Kidwell CS; Sayre JW; Saver JL
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 17000963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved clinical outcomes with compliance in routine use of standard medical therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Sharma A; GangiReddy S; Judson K; McAndrews J; Sharma B
J Cardiovasc Manag; 2004; 15(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 15315152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).
Pergolizzi J; Böger RH; Budd K; Dahan A; Erdine S; Hans G; Kress HG; Langford R; Likar R; Raffa RB; Sacerdote P
Pain Pract; 2008; 8(4):287-313. PubMed ID: 18503626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
