These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11728698)
1. Pseudo beam's-eye-view as applied to beam orientation selection in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Pugachev A; Xing L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Dec; 51(5):1361-70. PubMed ID: 11728698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted selection of coplanar beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Pugachev A; Xing L Phys Med Biol; 2001 Sep; 46(9):2467-76. PubMed ID: 11580182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Pugachev A; Li JG; Boyer AL; Hancock SL; Le QT; Donaldson SS; Xing L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jun; 50(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 11380245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy. Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating prior knowledge into beam orientation optimization in IMRT. Pugachev A; Xing L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Dec; 54(5):1565-74. PubMed ID: 12459386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beam's-eye-view Dosimetrics-guided inverse planning for aperture-modulated arc therapy. Ma Y; Popple R; Suh TS; Xing L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1587-95. PubMed ID: 19733446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose-volume based ranking of incident beam direction and its utility in facilitating IMRT beam placement. Schreibmann E; Xing L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 16168850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential clinical efficacy of intensity-modulated conformal therapy. Meeks SL; Buatti JM; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Mendenhall WM; Zlotecki RA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(2):483-95. PubMed ID: 9457839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord. Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of beamlet step-size on IMRT plan quality. Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Earl M; Yu C Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3448-54. PubMed ID: 16370431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conformal radiotherapy of challenging paraspinal tumors using a multiple arc segment technique. Pirzkall A; Lohr F; Rhein B; Höss A; Schlegel W; Wannenmacher M; Debus J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Nov; 48(4):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11072179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk. Bratengeier K; Holubyev K Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():207. PubMed ID: 26458947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma. Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Gillin M; Ahamad A; Ang K; Mohan R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 16168851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric effects of patient displacement and collimator and gantry angle misalignment on intensity modulated radiation therapy. Xing L; Lin Z; Donaldson SS; Le QT; Tate D; Goffinet DR; Wolden S; Ma L; Boyer AL Radiother Oncol; 2000 Jul; 56(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 10869760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies. Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison. De Meerleer GO; Vakaet LA; De Gersem WR; De Wagter C; De Naeyer B; De Neve W Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):639-48. PubMed ID: 10837946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated with coplanar field and 3D conformal radiotherapy with noncoplanar field for postocular invasion tumor. Wenyong T; Lu L; Jun Z; Weidong Y; Yun L Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19931025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic learning-based beam angle selection for thoracic IMRT. Amit G; Purdie TG; Levinshtein A; Hope AJ; Lindsay P; Marshall A; Jaffray DA; Pekar V Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1992-2005. PubMed ID: 25832090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving intensity-modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm. Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2170-9. PubMed ID: 18561692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]