247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11729162)
1. Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection.
Urrutia AO; Hurst LD
Genetics; 2001 Nov; 159(3):1191-9. PubMed ID: 11729162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selection on synonymous codons in mammalian rhodopsins: a possible role in optimizing translational processes.
Du J; Dungan SZ; Sabouhanian A; Chang BS
BMC Evol Biol; 2014 May; 14():96. PubMed ID: 24884412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular evolution of synonymous codon usage in Populus.
Ingvarsson PK
BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 8():307. PubMed ID: 18983655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila.
Powell JR; Moriyama EN
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 Jul; 94(15):7784-90. PubMed ID: 9223264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabditis remanei.
Cutter AD; Charlesworth B
Curr Biol; 2006 Oct; 16(20):2053-7. PubMed ID: 17055986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analyses of nucleotide, synonymous codon and amino acid usages at gene levels of Brucella melitensis strain QY1.
Cao XA; Hu W; Shang YJ; Liu YS; Han SY; Wang YN; Zhao L; Li XR; Zhou JH
Infect Genet Evol; 2018 Nov; 65():257-264. PubMed ID: 30092351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SENCA: A Multilayered Codon Model to Study the Origins and Dynamics of Codon Usage.
Pouyet F; Bailly-Bechet M; Mouchiroud D; Guéguen L
Genome Biol Evol; 2016 Aug; 8(8):2427-41. PubMed ID: 27401173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intragenomic variation in non-adaptive nucleotide biases causes underestimation of selection on synonymous codon usage.
Cope AL; Shah P
PLoS Genet; 2022 Jun; 18(6):e1010256. PubMed ID: 35714134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in Drosophila: mutation, selection or relaxed constraints?
Comeron JM; Kreitman M
Genetics; 1998 Oct; 150(2):767-75. PubMed ID: 9755207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Codon usage bias and dinucleotide preference in 29 Drosophila species.
Kokate PP; Techtmann SM; Werner T
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34849812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selection intensity for codon bias.
Hartl DL; Moriyama EN; Sawyer SA
Genetics; 1994 Sep; 138(1):227-34. PubMed ID: 8001789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gender-specific selection on codon usage in plant genomes.
Whittle CA; Malik MR; Krochko JE
BMC Genomics; 2007 Jun; 8():169. PubMed ID: 17567911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pervasive Strong Selection at the Level of Codon Usage Bias in
Machado HE; Lawrie DS; Petrov DA
Genetics; 2020 Feb; 214(2):511-528. PubMed ID: 31871131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Synonymous Codon Usages as an Evolutionary Dynamic for
Li Z; Hu W; Cao X; Liu P; Shang Y; Zhou J
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Dec; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 30545112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of Codon Usage Bias in Diatoms.
Krasovec M; Filatov DA
Genes (Basel); 2019 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 31698749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence that natural selection on codon usage in Drosophila pseudoobscura varies across codons.
Kliman RM
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(4):681-92. PubMed ID: 24531731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nucleotide composition and codon usage bias of SRY gene.
Choudhury MN; Uddin A; Chakraborty S
Andrologia; 2018 Feb; 50(1):. PubMed ID: 28124482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Codon Usage Optimization in the Prokaryotic Tree of Life: How Synonymous Codons Are Differentially Selected in Sequence Domains with Different Expression Levels and Degrees of Conservation.
López JL; Lozano MJ; Fabre ML; Lagares A
mBio; 2020 Jul; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 32694138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in human cancer-related genes undergo stronger purifying selections than expectation.
Chu D; Wei L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):359. PubMed ID: 30991970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
