These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11729329)

  • 1. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of the neuromagnetic N100m deflection to spectral bandwidth: a function of the auditory periphery?
    Seither-Preisler A; Krumbholz K; Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(6):322-37. PubMed ID: 14566103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.
    Seither-Preisler A; Patterson R; Krumbholz K; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 16464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. N100m in adults possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(9):1383-6. PubMed ID: 15194857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N100m latency shortening caused by selective attention.
    Nomura Y; Kawase T; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    Brain Res; 2021 Jan; 1751():147177. PubMed ID: 33121923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1775-9. PubMed ID: 16237325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory cortex activation associated with octave illusion.
    Lamminmäki S; Hari R
    Neuroreport; 2000 May; 11(7):1469-72. PubMed ID: 10841359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields.
    Kawase T; Maki A; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Sato M; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1037-42. PubMed ID: 21945467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuromagnetic evidence for early auditory restoration of fundamental pitch.
    Monahan PJ; de Souza K; Idsardi WJ
    PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e2900. PubMed ID: 18682843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric differences in frequency dependent dipole orientation of the human auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Emmerich E; Nowak H; Sauer H
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 Dec; 258(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 9875538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N100m in children possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2003 May; 14(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 12858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Piano tones evoke stronger magnetic fields than pure tones or noise, both in musicians and non-musicians.
    Lütkenhöner B; Seither-Preisler A; Seither S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16337814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.