These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11729329)

  • 21. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Seither-Preisler A; Lammertmann C; Lütkenhöner B
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Jul; 13(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 12816892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tonotopic representation of missing fundamental complex sounds in the human auditory cortex.
    Fujioka T; Ross B; Okamoto H; Takeshima Y; Kakigi R; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 18(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 12887425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency.
    Roberts TP; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1996 Apr; 7(6):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8817518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early processing of pitch in the human auditory system.
    Alho K; Grimm S; Mateo-León S; Costa-Faidella J; Escera C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 36(7):2972-8. PubMed ID: 22765015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence.
    Cheng CH; Hsu WY; Shih YH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Lin YY
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20600746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relation between the human frequency-following response and the low pitch of complex tones.
    Chambers RD; Feth LL; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1673-80. PubMed ID: 3794073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex.
    Rif J; Hari R; Hämäläinen MS; Sams M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Dec; 79(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 1721574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m in male patients with schizophrenia.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Nowak H; Sauer H
    J Psychiatr Res; 2000; 34(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 10867120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scalp potentials to pitch change in rapid tone sequences. A correlate of sequential stream segregation.
    Hung J; Jones SJ; Vaz Pato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Sep; 140(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 11500798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spectral response patterns of auditory cortex neurons to harmonic complex tones in alert monkey (Macaca mulatta).
    Schwarz DW; Tomlinson RW
    J Neurophysiol; 1990 Jul; 64(1):282-98. PubMed ID: 2388072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory evoked potentials to spectro-temporal modulation of complex tones in normal subjects and patients with severe brain injury.
    Jones SJ; Vaz Pato M; Sprague L; Stokes M; Munday R; Haque N
    Brain; 2000 May; 123 ( Pt 5)():1007-16. PubMed ID: 10775545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli.
    Yu HY; Chen JT; Wu ZA; Yeh TC; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Neurol Res; 2007 Jul; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neuromagnetic auditory cortex responses to duration and pitch changes in tones: cross-linguistic comparisons of human subjects in directions of acoustic changes.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ferrari P; Roberts TP
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Oct; 331(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 12361859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory cortical responses in humans with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss from early childhood.
    Vasama JP; Mäkelä JP
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):183-90. PubMed ID: 9119762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pitch processing of dynamic lexical tones in the auditory cortex is influenced by sensory and extrasensory processes.
    Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Suresh CH
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1496-504. PubMed ID: 25943576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.