259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11729776)
1. Evaluating health promotion programmes in the workplace.
Dugdill L; Springett J
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):285-308. PubMed ID: 11729776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Workplace health promotion program quality evaluation questionnaire].
Korzeniowska E; Puchalski K
Med Pr; 2002; 53(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 12577802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment methods and procedures in corporate health programs.
Richardson GE; Jessup GT; Beall BS; Reilley RR; Nixon CJ
Health Educ; 1986; 17(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 3152294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating community health promotion programmes.
Potvin L; Richard L
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):213-40. PubMed ID: 11729773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond process and outcome evaluation: a comprehensive approach for evaluating health promotion programmes.
Potvin L; Haddad S; Frohlich KL
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):45-62. PubMed ID: 11729783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The history and impact of worksite wellness.
Reardon J
Nurs Econ; 1998; 16(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 9748973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of worksite health enhancement programs.
Eddy JM; Gold RS; Zimmerli WH
Health Values; 1989; 13(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10291560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act--a wake-up call: great intentions, but a setback for health impact and cost-effectiveness of workplace health promotion.
O'Donnell MP
Am J Health Promot; 2010; 24(3):iv-v. PubMed ID: 20073380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating a federal health and fitness program: indicators of improving health.
Larsen P; Simons N
AAOHN J; 1993 Mar; 41(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 8476445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Issues in evaluating mass-media health communication campaigns.
Freimuth V; Cole G; Kirby SD
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):475-92. PubMed ID: 11729785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality in worksite health promotion: who is responsible?
Fielding JE
Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(2):128-9. PubMed ID: 1599721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of worksite health promotion programs on employee absenteeism. A comparative analysis.
Conrad KM; Riedel JE; Gibbs JO
AAOHN J; 1990 Dec; 38(12):573-80. PubMed ID: 2271070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating health promotion in schools: reflections.
Stewart-Brown S
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):271-84. PubMed ID: 11729775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health promotion in the workplace: alcohol and drug abuse. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser; 1993; 833():1-34. PubMed ID: 8367980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Occupational health-promotion programs: evaluation efforts and measured cost savings.
Katzman MS; Smith KJ
Health Values; 1989; 13(2):3-10. PubMed ID: 10312913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Requirements and quality of health promotion in the workplace--evaluation study].
Puchalski K; Korzeniowska E
Med Pr; 2003; 54(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 12731398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Designing an evaluation protocol.
Piserchia P; Hartwell T
Corp Comment; 1985 Nov; 1(5):38-46. PubMed ID: 10274391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ten steps to planning the evaluation.
Kelly K
Corp Comment; 1985 Nov; 1(5):30-7. PubMed ID: 10274390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Participatory approaches to evaluation in health promotion.
Springett J
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):83-105. PubMed ID: 11729790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.
Roe K; Roe K
Health Promot Pract; 2004 Apr; 5(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 15090168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
