BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11729783)

  • 1. Beyond process and outcome evaluation: a comprehensive approach for evaluating health promotion programmes.
    Potvin L; Haddad S; Frohlich KL
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):45-62. PubMed ID: 11729783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating health promotion programmes in the workplace.
    Dugdill L; Springett J
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):285-308. PubMed ID: 11729776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating healthcare systems.
    NT Learn Curve; 1998 Oct; 2(8):9-13. PubMed ID: 10067542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating community health promotion programmes.
    Potvin L; Richard L
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):213-40. PubMed ID: 11729773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating health promotion in schools: reflections.
    Stewart-Brown S
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):271-84. PubMed ID: 11729775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in evaluating mass-media health communication campaigns.
    Freimuth V; Cole G; Kirby SD
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):475-92. PubMed ID: 11729785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overview of formative, process, and outcome evaluation methods used in the VERB campaign.
    Berkowitz JM; Huhman M; Heitzler CD; Potter LD; Nolin MJ; Banspach SW
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Jun; 34(6 Suppl):S222-9. PubMed ID: 18471602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case study: the Canadian Heart Health Initiative.
    Stachenko S
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):463-73. PubMed ID: 11729784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Workplace health promotion program quality evaluation questionnaire].
    Korzeniowska E; Puchalski K
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 12577802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework for health promotion evaluation.
    Rootman I; Goodstadt M; Potvin L; Springett J
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):7-38. PubMed ID: 11729789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.
    Roe K; Roe K
    Health Promot Pract; 2004 Apr; 5(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 15090168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participatory approaches to evaluation in health promotion.
    Springett J
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):83-105. PubMed ID: 11729790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The potential contribution of realistic evaluation to small-scale community interventions.
    Lhussier M; Carr SM; Robson A
    Community Pract; 2008 Sep; 81(9):25-8. PubMed ID: 18834025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation in health promotion: synthesis and recommendations.
    Goodstadt MS; Hyndman B; McQueen DV; Potvin L; Rootman I; Springett J
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):517-33. PubMed ID: 11729787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health program evaluation in relation to health programming.The expectation and the reality.
    Thorner RM
    HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 Jun; 86(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 4951781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Community-based health promotion--a challenge for the evaluation].
    Loss J; Eichhorn C; Gehlert J; Donhauser J; Wise M; Nagel E
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 Feb; 69(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 17405079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designing an evaluation protocol.
    Piserchia P; Hartwell T
    Corp Comment; 1985 Nov; 1(5):38-46. PubMed ID: 10274391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of health promotion programmes].
    Berkowska M; Sito A
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):27-41. PubMed ID: 11490057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten steps to planning the evaluation.
    Kelly K
    Corp Comment; 1985 Nov; 1(5):30-7. PubMed ID: 10274390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grading of evidence of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions.
    Tang KC; Choi BC; Beaglehole R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Sep; 62(9):832-4. PubMed ID: 18701736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.