833 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11730399)
1. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.
Kjaergard LL; Villumsen J; Gluud C
Ann Intern Med; 2001 Dec; 135(11):982-9. PubMed ID: 11730399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.
Savović J; Jones H; Altman D; Harris R; Jűni P; Pildal J; Als-Nielsen B; Balk E; Gluud C; Gluud L; Ioannidis J; Schulz K; Beynon R; Welton N; Wood L; Moher D; Deeks J; Sterne J
Health Technol Assess; 2012 Sep; 16(35):1-82. PubMed ID: 22989478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
Moher D; Pham B; Jones A; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Moher M; Tugwell P; Klassen TP
Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):609-13. PubMed ID: 9746022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews.
He J; Du L; Liu G; Fu J; He X; Yu J; Shang L
Trials; 2011 May; 12():122. PubMed ID: 21569452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; da Costa BR; Flores-Mir C
J Dent Res; 2018 Jan; 97(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28813182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials.
Savović J; Jones HE; Altman DG; Harris RJ; Jüni P; Pildal J; Als-Nielsen B; Balk EM; Gluud C; Gluud LL; Ioannidis JP; Schulz KF; Beynon R; Welton NJ; Wood L; Moher D; Deeks JJ; Sterne JA
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Sep; 157(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22945832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.
Wood L; Egger M; Gluud LL; Schulz KF; Jüni P; Altman DG; Gluud C; Martin RM; Wood AJ; Sterne JA
BMJ; 2008 Mar; 336(7644):601-5. PubMed ID: 18316340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correction: reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.
Gluud LL; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Woods L; Harris R; Sterne JA
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Aug; 149(3):219. PubMed ID: 18942172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions.
Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; da Costa BR; Flores-Mir C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):42. PubMed ID: 29776394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials: A survey of seven core journals of orthopaedics from Mainland China over 5 years following the CONSORT statement.
Zhang J; Chen X; Zhu Q; Cui J; Cao L; Su J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 102(7):933-938. PubMed ID: 27514437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Hayes RJ; Altman DG
JAMA; 1995 Feb; 273(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 7823387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Funding, disease area, and internal validity of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
Kjaergard LL; Gluud C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Nov; 97(11):2708-13. PubMed ID: 12425537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study.
Savovic J; Turner RM; Mawdsley D; Jones HE; Beynon R; Higgins JPT; Sterne JAC
Am J Epidemiol; 2018 May; 187(5):1113-1122. PubMed ID: 29126260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
Als-Nielsen B; Chen W; Gluud C; Kjaergard LL
JAMA; 2003 Aug; 290(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 12928469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association Between Lack of Blinding and Mortality Results in Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.
Martin GL; Trioux T; Gaudry S; Tubach F; Hajage D; Dechartres A
Crit Care Med; 2021 Oct; 49(10):1800-1811. PubMed ID: 33927122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials.
Hill CL; LaValley MP; Felson DT
J Clin Epidemiol; 2002 Aug; 55(8):783-6. PubMed ID: 12384192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality.
Huwiler-Müntener K; Jüni P; Junker C; Egger M
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2801-4. PubMed ID: 12038917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
Gluud LL; Sørensen TI; Gøtzsche PC; Gluud C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5. PubMed ID: 16279896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
