These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11732043)

  • 1. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate children using an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device: a report of 2 cases.
    Harada K; Baba Y; Ohyama K; Enomoto S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 59(12):1492-6. PubMed ID: 11732043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis with rigid external distraction.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11905329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
    He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part one. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for advancement in cleft patients, internal devices.
    Drew SJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2592-7. PubMed ID: 19022140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction of Le Fort II osteotomy by intraoral distractor: a case report.
    Cheung LK; Lo J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):856-60. PubMed ID: 16631498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rigid external distraction using skeletal anchorage to cleft maxilla united with alveolar bone grafting.
    Kita H; Kochi S; Imai Y; Yamada A; Yamaguchi T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 May; 42(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 15865469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distraction osteogenesis in the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Scolozzi P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1199-214. PubMed ID: 18812842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary advancement using distraction osteogenesis with intraoral device.
    Takigawa Y; Uematsu S; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1165-75. PubMed ID: 20677971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maxillary advancement and transpalatal expansion using internal distraction in a patient with cleft lip and palate.
    Scolozzi P; Herzog G; Jaques B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 18812875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Oct; 102(5):1360-72; discussion 1373-4. PubMed ID: 9773990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphological evaluation of changes in velopharyngeal function following maxillary distraction in patients with repaired cleft palate during mixed dentition.
    Satoh K; Nagata J; Shomura K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Fukuda J; Shiba R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Jul; 41(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 15222793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transantral distraction devices in correction of severe maxillary deformity in cleft patients.
    Shokirov S; Wangerin K
    Stomatologija; 2011; 13(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21558788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New fixation method for maxillary distraction osteogenesis using locking attachments.
    Suzuki EY; Buranastidporn B; Ishii M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1553-60. PubMed ID: 16982316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anterior maxillary distraction using a tooth-borne device for hypoplastic cleft maxillas-a pilot study.
    Richardson S; Agni NA; Selvaraj D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e542-8. PubMed ID: 22117711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up.
    Ko EW; Figueroa AA; Guyette TW; Polley JW; Law WR
    J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Jul; 10(4):312-20; discussion 321-2. PubMed ID: 10686880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    J Craniofac Surg; 1997 May; 8(3):181-5; discussion 186. PubMed ID: 9482064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimizing pin complications when using the rigid external distraction (RED) system for midface distraction.
    Aizenbud D; Rachmiel A; Emodi O
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 18230386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term follow-up after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing children with cleft lip and palate.
    Huang CS; Harikrishnan P; Liao YF; Ko EW; Liou EJ; Chen PK
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 May; 44(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 17477762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new Le Fort I internal distraction device in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia.
    Gateno J; Engel ER; Teichgraeber JF; Yamaji KE; Xia JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 15635571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New internal Le Fort I distractor for the treatment of midface hypoplasia.
    Yamaji KE; Gateno J; Xia JJ; Teichgraeber JF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 14704578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.