83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11732834)
1. Reliability of hearing thresholds: computer-automated testing with ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(5):567-81. PubMed ID: 11732834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 14582529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test-retest reliability of in situ unaided thresholds in adults.
Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N; Chivers C; Highley P; Williams DK
Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16803794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch matching.
Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 11732833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips.
O'Brien A; Keidser G; Yeend I; Hartley L; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):868-76. PubMed ID: 20812890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing adults: a test-retest reliability study.
D'Haenens W; Vinck BM; De Vel E; Maes L; Bockstael A; Keppler H; Philips B; Swinnen F; Dhooge I
Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):489-98. PubMed ID: 18698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Extended high-frequency audiometry--reproducibility of two type of earphones].
Schmuziger N; Gantenbein M; Smurzynski J; Bertoli S; Probst R
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000; Suppl 125():75S-76S. PubMed ID: 11141946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
Mills DM
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies.
Luts H; Desloovere C; Kumar A; Vandermeersch E; Wouters J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):915-26. PubMed ID: 15183583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses.
Luts H; Van Dun B; Alaerts J; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):638-50. PubMed ID: 18469712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New instrumentation for automated tinnitus psychoacoustic assessment.
Henry JA; Rheinsburg B; Owens KK; Ellingson RM
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2006 Dec; (556):34-8. PubMed ID: 17114140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones.
Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15064657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring.
Gordon JS; Phillips DS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16187247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
