639 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11735678)
1. Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer.
Plosker GL; Hurst M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1111-34. PubMed ID: 11735678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Young M; Plosker GL
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(12):1227-59. PubMed ID: 11772158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A pharmacoeconomic review.
Coukell AJ; Noble S; Faulds D
Pharmacoeconomics; 1999 Apr; 15(4):405-17. PubMed ID: 10537959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Sidhu M; Hewitson P; Waugh N
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(32):1-195. PubMed ID: 12065068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectivenes of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Earle CC; Evans WK
Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(5-6):815-20. PubMed ID: 10360660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline.
Chu Q; Vincent M; Logan D; Mackay JA; Evans WK;
Lung Cancer; 2005 Dec; 50(3):355-74. PubMed ID: 16139391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Plosker GL; Figgitt DP
Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(6):389-411. PubMed ID: 15099124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision framework for chemotherapeutic interventions for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
Berthelot JM; Will BP; Evans WK; Coyle D; Earle CC; Bordeleau L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Aug; 92(16):1321-9. PubMed ID: 10944554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of three regimens using vinorelbine (Navelbine) for non-small cell lung cancer.
Hillner BE; Smith TJ
Semin Oncol; 1996 Apr; 23(2 Suppl 5):25-30. PubMed ID: 8610234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Hewitson P; Sidhu M; Waugh N
Thorax; 2002 Jan; 57(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 11809985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of vinorelbine alone or vinorelbine plus cisplatin for stage IV NSCLC.
Evans WK
Oncology (Williston Park); 1998 Mar; 12(3 Suppl 4):18-25; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 9556779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Docetaxel for locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Current data and future directions as front-line therapy.
Khuri FR
Oncology (Williston Park); 2002 Jun; 16(6 Suppl 6):53-62. PubMed ID: 12108898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cost-effectiveness of navelbine alone or in combination with cisplatin in comparison to other chemotherapy regimens and best supportive care in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Evans WK; Le Chevalier T
Eur J Cancer; 1996 Dec; 32A(13):2249-55. PubMed ID: 9038606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cisplatin plus etoposide and carboplatin plus paclitaxel in a phase III randomized trial for non-small cell lung cancer.
Thongprasert S; Permsuwan U; Ruengorn C; Charoentum C; Chewaskulyong B
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2011 Dec; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 22151987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-minimization analysis for Portugal of five doublet chemotherapy regimens from two phase III trials in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Pimentel FL; Bhalla S; Laranjeira L; Guerreiro M
Lung Cancer; 2006 Jun; 52(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 16650499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel (Taxol) + cisplatin is similar to that of teniposide + cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicountry analysis.
Annemans L; Giaccone G; Vergnenègre A
Anticancer Drugs; 1999 Jul; 10(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 10885909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of first-line induction and maintenance treatment sequences in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the U.S.
Kumar G; Woods B; Hess LM; Treat J; Boye ME; Bryden P; Winfree KB
Lung Cancer; 2015 Sep; 89(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 26122345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Docetaxel: a review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer.
Comer AM; Goa KL
Drugs Aging; 2000 Jul; 17(1):53-80. PubMed ID: 10933515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time-Series Modeling and Simulation for Comparative Cost-Effective Analysis in Cancer Chemotherapy: An Application to Platinum-Based Regimens for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Chisaki Y; Nakamura N; Yano Y
Biol Pharm Bull; 2017; 40(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 28049952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-minimisation analysis of three regimens of chemotherapy (docetaxel-cisplatin, paclitaxel-cisplatin, paclitaxel-carboplatin) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Rubio-Terrés C; Tisaire JL; Kobina S; Moyano A
Lung Cancer; 2002 Jan; 35(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 11750717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
