These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1173660)

  • 1. Letter: A medicolegal encounter in Maryland.
    JAMA; 1975 Aug; 233(6):510. PubMed ID: 1173660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defective children, their parents, and the death decision.
    Nolan-Haley JM
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Jan; 4(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1082475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Checkmating the Baby Doe regulations.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 3744798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-intervention in children with major handicaps. Legal and ethical issues.
    Aust Paediatr J; 1983 Dec; 19(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6201157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter: On withholding treatment.
    De Veber LL
    Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Dec; 111(11):1183, 1185. PubMed ID: 4434283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue.
    Lang GC
    West J Med; 1985 Jun; 142(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 4024642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court.
    Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):27. PubMed ID: 11645566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicolegal review: treatment problems involving newborn infants.
    Stromberg RE; Cannizzo C
    Hosp Med Staff; 1977 Jun; 6(6):6-13. PubMed ID: 10236456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe.
    Cantrell DF
    Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On withholding treatment.
    Guttman FM
    Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Sep; 111(6):520, 523. PubMed ID: 4414923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deciding the care of infants with poor prognosis.
    Areen J
    Semin Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 11(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 3616656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe.
    Gerry MH; Nimz M
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
    O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
    Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism.
    Brandel A
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law?
    Burt RA
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics committees for infants doe?
    Fleischman AR; Murray TH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):5-9. PubMed ID: 6228539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.