120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11736707)
1. Digital skeletal radiography. Reduction of absorbed dose by adaptation of exposure factors and image processing.
Axelsson B; Petersen U; Wiltz HJ
Acta Radiol; 2001 Nov; 42(6):592-8. PubMed ID: 11736707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the tube potential for lumbar spine radiography with a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Norrman E; Persliden J
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):62-8. PubMed ID: 19095816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of absorbed dose in storage phosphor urography by significant lowering of tube voltage and adjustment of image display parameters.
Wiltz HJ; Petersen U; Axelsson B
Acta Radiol; 2005 Jul; 46(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 16134316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of postprocessed low-dose radiographs in skeletal imaging.
Kolck J; Ziegeler K; Walter-Rittel T; Hermann KGA; Hamm B; Beck A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20210881. PubMed ID: 34919419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimisation of the lateral lumbar spine projection using an air-gap technique.
Bellizzi A; Zarb F
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 32052755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Iterative scatter correction for grid-less skeletal radiography allows improved image quality equal to an antiscatter grid in adjunct with dose reduction: a visual grading study of 20 body donors.
Lisson CG; Lisson CS; Kleiner S; Regier M; Beer M; Schmidt SA
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):735-741. PubMed ID: 30149748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CAN SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE REPLACE A GRID IN DR PELVIC EXAMINATIONS?
Precht H; Mørup SD; Tingberg A; Outzen CB; Kusk KW; Nielsen RM; Midtgård M; Winther MB; Waaler D; Kusk MW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31111927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
Wenman A; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.
Peacock NE; Steward AL; Riley PJ
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 32495517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing image quality and dose for digital radiography of distal pediatric extremities using the contrast-to-noise ratio.
Hess R; Neitzel U
Rofo; 2012 Jul; 184(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 22618480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose reduction in scoliosis patients: low-dose full-spine radiography with digital flat panel detector and image stitching system.
Grieser T; Baldauf AQ; Ludwig K
Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 21614741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of chest and abdominal exposure dose appropriate for a digital image reader system incorporating a columnar-crystal structured phosphor plate and a contrast-detail phantom.
Saito K; Hiramoto S; Gomi T; Muramoto N; Seki M; Tsukimura K; Suzuki H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 20821154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Fundamentals of relationship between physical image quality and radiation dose in digital radiography].
Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1473-7. PubMed ID: 22104242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
