120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11736707)
21. [Chest tomosynthesis].
Shibata K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1486-91. PubMed ID: 22104244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality.
Yu L; Christner JA; Leng S; Wang J; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6371-9. PubMed ID: 22149820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.
Precht H; Gerke O; Rosendahl K; Tingberg A; Waaler D
Pediatr Radiol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):1112-8. PubMed ID: 22526280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Reduction method of patients' radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector].
Kato M; Chida K; Yoshida K; Sasaki F; Sasaki M; Oosaka H; Tosa T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1443-7. PubMed ID: 22104237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A factorial experiment on image quality and radiation dose.
Norrman E; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):246-52. PubMed ID: 15933116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT.
Gurung J; Khan MF; Maataoui A; Herzog C; Bux R; Bratzke H; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15806366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pediatric thoracic CT angiography at 70 kV: a phantom study to investigate the effects on image quality and radiation dose.
MacDougall RD; Kleinman PL; Yu L; Lee EY
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Jul; 46(8):1114-9. PubMed ID: 26987734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
Shanahan MC
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
