These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11736707)

  • 41. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations.
    Persliden J; Beckman KW; Geijer H; Andersson T
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12042972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Removal of Antiscatter Grids for Spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography: Dose Reduction without Loss of Diagnostic Value.
    Orrù E; Mekabaty AE; Millan DS; Pearl MS; Gailloud P
    Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32125257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
    Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Absorbed dose and image quality in examinations of the colon with digital and analogue techniques.
    Persliden J; Larsson P; Norén B; Wirell S
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Nov; 38(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 9394659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7379-7393. PubMed ID: 28742062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Parameterized algorithms for quantitative differentials in spectrally equivalent medical diagnostic x-ray beams.
    Okunade AA
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1785-95. PubMed ID: 16013736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
    Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery.
    Slomczykowski M; Roberto M; Schneeberger P; Ozdoba C; Vock P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 May; 24(10):975-82; discussion 983. PubMed ID: 10332788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Characteristic evaluation and clinical usefulness of dose area product meter at radiography].
    Nakamae M; Tatsumi Y; Morioka S; Masuda S; Kitanaka Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1448-53. PubMed ID: 22104238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A systematic procedure to optimise dose and image quality for the measurement of inter-vertebral angles from lateral spinal projections using Cobb and superimposition methods.
    Al Qaroot B; Hogg P; Twiste M; Howard D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):613-25. PubMed ID: 25265922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Study of image quality (contrast) and reduction of patient dose by using heavy metal filters].
    Oishi Y; Sano Y; Yoshida K; Iwanaga H; Yasui K; Fujimoto K; Nishimura H; Otsuka A; Sanada T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jan; 58(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 12527881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT.
    Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.