These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11737535)

  • 1. Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale with analogue functional analysis and the Motivation Assessment Scale.
    Paclawskyj TR; Matson JL; Rush KS; Smalls Y; Vollmer TR
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2001 Dec; 45(Pt 6):484-94. PubMed ID: 11737535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional Analysis Outcomes and Comparison of Direct Observations and Informant Rating Scales in the Assessment of Severe Behavior Problems of Infants and Toddlers At-Risk for Developmental Delays.
    Schroeder SR; Richman DM; Abby L; Courtemanche AB; Oyama-Ganiko R
    J Dev Phys Disabil; 2014 Jun; 26(3):325-334. PubMed ID: 24778543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A concise review of the correspondence between the traditional functional analysis and alternative assessment formats.
    Rahaman JA; Fahmie TA; Melanson IJ; DeBrine JE; Zangrillo AN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2024 Mar; 57(2):515-520. PubMed ID: 38361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retraction notice to "Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF): Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version" [Research in Developmental Disabilities 34/4 (2013) 1248-1255].
    Simó-Pinatella D; Alomar-Kurz E; Font-Roura J; Giné C; Matson JL; Cifre I
    Res Dev Disabil; 2023 Mar; 134():104446. PubMed ID: 36737388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior.
    Durand VM; Crimmins DB
    J Autism Dev Disord; 1988 Mar; 18(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 3372462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of the functional analysis screening tool.
    Iwata BA; Deleon IG; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):271-84. PubMed ID: 24114099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative effectiveness trial of functional behavioral assessment methods.
    Call NA; Bernstein AM; O'Brien MJ; Schieltz KM; Tsami L; Lerman DC; Berg WK; Lindgren SD; Connelly MA; Wacker DP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2024 Jan; 57(1):166-183. PubMed ID: 38049887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Reliability and Treatment Utility of the Practical Functional Assessment Process.
    Rajaraman A; Hanley GP; Gover HC; Ruppel KW; Landa RK
    Behav Anal Pract; 2022 Sep; 15(3):815-837. PubMed ID: 36465598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine Learning for Supplementing Behavioral Assessment.
    Bailey JD; Baker JC; Rzeszutek MJ; Lanovaz MJ
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2021 Dec; 44(4):605-619. PubMed ID: 35098027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Preliminary Evaluation of Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Open-Ended Indirect Assessment.
    Saini V; Ubdegrove K; Biran S; Duncan R
    Behav Anal Pract; 2020 Mar; 13(1):114-125. PubMed ID: 32231972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and Validity of Indirect Assessment Outcomes: Experts versus Caregivers.
    Dracobly JD; Dozier CL; Briggs AM; Juanico JF
    Learn Motiv; 2018 May; 62():77-90. PubMed ID: 30147146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the Impact of Psychotropic Medication Changes on Challenging Behavior of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities.
    Valdovinos MG; Henninger-McMahon M; Schieber E; Beard L; Conley B; Haas A
    Int J Dev Disabil; 2016; 62(3):200-211. PubMed ID: 27429750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of synthesized and individual reinforcement contingencies during functional analysis.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Romani PW; Zangrillo AN; Owen TM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):596-616. PubMed ID: 27174563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A statewide survey assessing practitioners' use and perceived utility of functional assessment.
    Roscoe EM; Phillips KM; Kelly MA; Farber R; Dube WV
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 26411695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. REDUCING AMBIGUITY IN THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR.
    Rooker GW; DeLeon IG; Borrero CS; Frank-Crawford MA; Roscoe EM
    Behav Interv; 2015 Feb; 30(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 26236145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple-respondent anecdotal assessments: an analysis of interrater agreement and correspondence with analogue assessment outcomes.
    Smith CM; Smith RG; Dracobly JD; Pace AP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):779-95. PubMed ID: 23322932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An indirect examination of the function of problem behavior associated with fragile X syndrome and Smith-Magenis syndrome.
    Langthorne P; McGill P
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2012 Feb; 42(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 21442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Caregivers' agreement and validity of indirect functional analysis: a cross cultural evaluation across multiple problem behavior topographies.
    Virues-Ortega J; Segui-Duran D; Descalzo-Quero A; Carnerero JJ; Martin N
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2011 Jan; 41(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 20443134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brief report: a comparison of indirect versus experimental strategies for the assessment of pica.
    Wasano LC; Borrero JC; Kohn CS
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2009 Nov; 39(11):1582-6. PubMed ID: 19488846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.