These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11738779)

  • 1. Evidence-based guidelines for the use of defibrillation pads.
    Drury NE; Petley GW; Clewlow F; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2001 Dec; 51(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 11738779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How often should defibrillation pads be changed?: the effect of evaporative drying.
    Deakin CD; Petley GW; Drury NE; Clewlow F
    Resuscitation; 2001 Feb; 48(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 11426477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrode pad size, transthoracic impedance and success of external ventricular defibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Oct; 64(12):741-4. PubMed ID: 2801525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of transthoracic impedance using standard defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibrillation pads.
    Deakin CD; McLaren RM; Petley GW; Clewlow F; Dalrymple-Hay MJ
    Resuscitation; 1998; 39(1-2):43-6. PubMed ID: 9918446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External defibrillation in the left lateral position--a comparison of manual paddles with self-adhesive pads.
    Dodd TE; Deakin CD; Petley GW; Clewlow F
    Resuscitation; 2004 Dec; 63(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 15582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-adhesive preapplied electrode pads for defibrillation and cardioversion.
    Kerber RE; Martins JB; Kelly KJ; Ferguson DW; Kouba C; Jensen SR; Newman B; Parke JD; Kieso R; Melton J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Mar; 3(3):815-20. PubMed ID: 6693652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Successful low-energy cardioversion using a novel biodegradable gel pad: Feasibility of treating postoperative atrial fibrillation in animals.
    Iino K; Yui N; Ooya T; Kawabata R; Tomita S; Watanabe G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 134(6):1519-25. PubMed ID: 18023676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transthoracic defibrillation: does electrode adhesive pad position alter transthoracic impedance?
    Garcia LA; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 1998 Jun; 37(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 9715772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the orientation of the apical defibrillation paddle of importance during manual external defibrillation?
    Deakin CD; Sado DM; Petley GW; Clewlow F
    Resuscitation; 2003 Jan; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 12505733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental evaluation and initial clinical application of new self-adhesive defibrillation electrodes.
    Kerber RE; Martins JB; Ferguson DW; Jensen SR; Parke JD; Kieso R; Melton J
    Int J Cardiol; 1985 May; 8(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 3997292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
    Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective evaluation of current-based impedance compensation defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Chen B; Yin C; Ristagno G; Quan W; Tan Q; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 23000364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy between two pads placements in a pediatric porcine model of cardiac arrest.
    Ristagno G; Yu T; Quan W; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2012 Jun; 83(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 22198420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Matveev M; Mudrov N; Prokopova R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1009-22. PubMed ID: 16951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External defibrillation: new technologies.
    Kerber RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1984 Sep; 13(9 Pt 2):794-7. PubMed ID: 6476544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-adhesive monitor/defibrillation pads improve prehospital defibrillation success.
    Stults KR; Brown DD; Cooley F; Kerber RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1987 Aug; 16(8):872-7. PubMed ID: 3619167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
    Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L
    Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on transthoracic impedance--implications for defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; McLaren RM; Petley GW; Clewlow F; Dalrymple-Hay MJ
    Resuscitation; 1998 Apr; 37(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 9667332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.