These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. European Parliament rejects bid to stem confusion over gene patents. Dickson D Nature; 1995 Mar; 374(6518):103. PubMed ID: 7877671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. European patents. Tough stance on stem cell, DNA claims. Vogel G Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):754-5. PubMed ID: 12161624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cloning and the U.S. Congress. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1599-602. PubMed ID: 11994549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. European perspectives on therapeutic cloning. Evers K N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1579-82. PubMed ID: 11994550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who owns my DNA?: the national and international intellectual property law on human embryonic tissue and cloning. Knowles SM; Adams SD Cumberland Law Rev; 2001-2002; 32(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 12645552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should human cloning research be off limits? Kassirer JP; Rosenthal NA N Engl J Med; 1998 Mar; 338(13):905-6. PubMed ID: 9516227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patents on parts of the human body: salient issues under EC and WTO law. Herdegen M J World Intellect Prop; 2002 Mar; 5(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 15986546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patent protection for stem cell procedures under the law of the European Union. Spranger TM Med Etika Bioet; 2003; 10(1-2):4-8. PubMed ID: 16294439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommended response for human cloning patent applications. Nash D IDEA J Law Technol; 2002; 42(2):279-312. PubMed ID: 15732181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Are patents and research compatible? Ducor P Nature; 1997 May; 387(6628):13-4. PubMed ID: 9139814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The attack of the clones: patent law and stem cell research. Rimmer M J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):488-505. PubMed ID: 12852321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Some reflections on an international convention on the banning of human cloning and related patents. Eugui DV; Spennemann C J World Intellect Prop; 2003 May; 6(3):485-505. PubMed ID: 15986547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patenting of human embryonic stem cells in Europe. Treichel P Biotechnol J; 2009 Apr; 4(4):462-4. PubMed ID: 19370720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryonic stem cells. Australian agreement allows new lines. Dayton L Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5566):238. PubMed ID: 11951010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical questions to ponder in the European stem cell patent debate. Curley D; Sharples A J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 17152135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cloning and embryo research in Australia: legalization of destructive embryo research. Ford N Ethics Medics; 2003 Mar; 28(3):2-4. PubMed ID: 16206466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The prodigal son: the relationship between patent law and health care. Bostyn SJ Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 14606473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]