These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11740963)

  • 1. Comparison of pulse activation vs conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Wei SH; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2002 Jan; 18(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 11740963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods.
    Luo Y; Tay FR; Lo EC; Wei SH
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):495-500. PubMed ID: 10960753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bond strengths of Dyract AP compomer material to dentin of permanent and primary molars: phosphoric acid versus non-rinse conditioner.
    Baghdadi ZD
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 14528776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel.
    Pashley DH; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):430-44. PubMed ID: 11445211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT.
    Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Kugel G; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 10477987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.
    Frankenberger R; Perdigão J; Rosa BT; Lopes M
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 11445203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM evaluation of a non-rinse conditioner and a self-etching adhesive regarding enamel penetration.
    Miranda MS; Cal Neto JO; Barceleiro Mde O; Dias KR
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 16536197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative SEM evaluation of penetration of adhesive systems in human dentin with a non-rinse conditioner and a self-etching primer.
    Cal-Neto JP; de Miranda MS; Dias KR
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15322640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.
    Burrow MF; Nopnakeepong U; Phrukkanon S
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11823016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of microleakage on one composite etched with phosphoric acid or a combination of phosphoric and hydrofluoric acids and bonded with several different systems.
    Szep S; Langner N; Bayer S; Börnichen D; Schulz C; Gerhardt T; Schriever A; Becker J; Heidemann D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 12616236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of two adhesive systems used with compomer filling materials.
    Moodley D; Grobler SR; Rossouw RJ; Oberholzer TG; Patel N
    Int Dent J; 2000 Dec; 50(6):400-6. PubMed ID: 11197201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.