These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11742644)

  • 41. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
    Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey.
    Porter M; van Teijlingen E; Chi Ying Yip L; Bhattacharya S
    Birth; 2007 Jun; 34(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 17542819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden.
    Nieminen K; Stephansson O; Ryding EL
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 19488882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea--a society with high cesarean section rates.
    Lee SI; Khang YH; Lee MS
    Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 15153130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Factors associated with successful vaginal delivery after cesarean section.
    Whiteside DC; Mahan CS; Cook JC
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Nov; 28(11):785-8. PubMed ID: 6655637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Voices of distress. Women speak about cesarean sections.
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2003; (68):22-4. PubMed ID: 14730852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Women's preference for cesarean delivery and differences between Taiwanese women undergoing different modes of delivery.
    Chu KH; Tai CJ; Hsu CS; Yeh MC; Chien LY
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 May; 10():138. PubMed ID: 20504354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A longitudinal survey of childbirth-related fear and associated factors.
    Hildingsson I; Nilsson C; Karlström A; Lundgren I
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 40(5):532-43. PubMed ID: 22273410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.
    Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.
    Thurman AR; Zoller JS; Swift SE
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 15580415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Attitudes towards mode of delivery and cesarean on demand in Turkey.
    Koken G; Cosar E; Sahin FK; Tolga Arioz D; Duman Z; Aral I
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Dec; 99(3):233-5. PubMed ID: 17673239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community.
    Walker R; Turnbull D; Wilkinson C
    Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 15153131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Women's perceptions and experiences of childbirth in United Arab Emirates.
    Rizk DE; Nasser M; Thomas L; Ezimokhai M
    J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 11565198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Trial of labor vs. elective repeat cesarean section. AAFP Task Force on Clinical Policies for Patient Care.
    Am Fam Physician; 1995 Nov; 52(6):1763-5. PubMed ID: 7484686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Birth plans: tickets to the OR?
    White-Corey S
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2013; 38(5):268-73; quiz 274-5. PubMed ID: 23797662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does epidural increase the incidence of cesarean delivery or instrumental labor in Saudi populations?
    Bakhamees H; Hegazy E
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 19(3):693-704. PubMed ID: 18044297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.
    Tongsong T; Jitawong C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Sep; 86(9):829-35. PubMed ID: 14649967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.