These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11743037)

  • 1. Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening?
    Drossaert CH; Boer H; Seydel ER
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 11743037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring women's experiences during three rounds of breast cancer screening: results from a longitudinal study.
    Drossaert CH; Boer H; Seydel ER
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 12518007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
    Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's opinions about attending for breast cancer screening: stability of cognitive determinants during three rounds of screening.
    Drossaert CH; Boer H; Seydel ER
    Br J Health Psychol; 2005 Feb; 10(Pt 1):133-49. PubMed ID: 15826339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anxiety in a cohort of Swiss women participating in a mammographic screening programme.
    Meystre-Agustoni G; Paccaud F; Jeannin A; Dubois-Arber F
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 11743038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Once is enough--why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme.
    Elwood M; McNoe B; Smith T; Bandaranayake M; Doyle TC
    N Z Med J; 1998 May; 111(1066):180-3. PubMed ID: 9640316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study. A questionnaire survey.
    Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    Cancer; 1990 Apr; 65(7):1663-9. PubMed ID: 2311075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the psychological impact of mammographic screening on younger women with a family history of breast cancer? Findings from a prospective cohort study by the PIMMS Management Group.
    Tyndel S; Austoker J; Henderson BJ; Brain K; Bankhead C; Clements A; Watson EK
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 25(25):3823-30. PubMed ID: 17761970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme.
    O'Byrne AM; Kavanagh AM; Ugoni A; Diver F
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 11202585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer screening implementation and reassurance.
    Osterø J; Siersma V; Brodersen J
    Eur J Public Health; 2014 Apr; 24(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 23788014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The psychological effects of breast screening in terms of patients' perceived health anxieties.
    Swanson V; McIntosh IB; Power KG; Dobson H
    Br J Clin Pract; 1996; 50(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 8733330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?
    Ganott MA; Sumkin JH; King JL; Klym AH; Catullo VJ; Cohen CS; Gur D
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 16505392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL; Mondrus GT; Danley K; Deapen D; Mack T
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.