These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11743151)
1. Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial. Vingerhoets E; Wensing M; Grol R Qual Health Care; 2001 Dec; 10(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 11743151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care. Jung HP; Wensing M; Olesen F; Grol R Qual Saf Health Care; 2002 Dec; 11(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 12468690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination in general practice in Europe. Wensing M; Hermsen J; Grol R; Szecsenyi J Health Expect; 2008 Dec; 11(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 19076666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User satisfaction with a real-time automated feedback system for general practitioners: a quantitative and qualitative study. Bindels R; Hasman A; Derickx M; Van Wersch JW; Winkens RA Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Dec; 15(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 14660533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reliability of patients' judgements of care in general practice: how many questions and patients are needed? Wensing M; van de Vleuten C; Grol R; Felling A Qual Health Care; 1997 Jun; 6(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 10173260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of patient evaluations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries. Kerssens JJ; Groenewegen PP; Sixma HJ; Boerma WG; van der Eijk I Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Feb; 82(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 15042232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers. van den Hombergh P; Grol R; van den Hoogen HJ; van den Bosch WJ Qual Health Care; 1999 Sep; 8(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 10847872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the health status of chronically ill patients predict their judgements of the quality of general practice care? Wensing M; Grol R; Asberg J; van Montfort P; van Weel C; Felling A Qual Life Res; 1997 May; 6(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 9248311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Patients' evaluations as quality measurements in general practice]. Heje HN; Olesen F Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Nov; 164(46):5386-9. PubMed ID: 12469385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient experiences with family medicine: a longitudinal study after the Dutch health care reforms in 2006. van den Hombergh P; van Doorn-Klomberg A; Campbell S; Wensing M; Braspenning J BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 27561993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patients with persistent medically unexplained symptoms in general practice: characteristics and quality of care. Dirkzwager AJ; Verhaak PF BMC Fam Pract; 2007 May; 8():33. PubMed ID: 17540013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Doctor and practice characteristics associated with differences in patient evaluations of general practice. Heje HN; Vedsted P; Sokolowski I; Olesen F BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Apr; 7():46. PubMed ID: 17407605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality of general practice as experienced by patients]. Kvamme OJ; Sandvik L; Hjortdahl P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(21):2503-6. PubMed ID: 11070985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indicators of the quality of general practice care of patients with chronic illness: a step towards the real involvement of patients in the assessment of the quality of care. Wensing M; Grol R; van Montfort P; Smits A Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 5(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 10158595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ['Consumer quality'-index 'General practice care' measures patients' experiences and compares general practices with each other]. Meuwissen LE; de Bakker DH Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A180. PubMed ID: 19900331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: acceptance and feasibility. van den Hombergh P; Grol R; van den Hoogen HJ; van den Bosch WJ Qual Health Care; 1999 Sep; 8(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 10847873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey. Bower P; Roland M; Campbell J; Mead N BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7383):258. PubMed ID: 12560279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement? Wensing M; Vingerhoets E; Grol R Patient Educ Couns; 2003 Oct; 51(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 14572944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. General practitioners' experience and benefits from patient evaluations. Heje HN; Vedsted P; Olesen F BMC Fam Pract; 2011 Oct; 12():116. PubMed ID: 22040039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a proactive, goal-oriented, integrated care model in general practice for older people. A cluster randomised controlled trial: Integrated Systematic Care for older People--the ISCOPE study. Blom J; den Elzen W; van Houwelingen AH; Heijmans M; Stijnen T; Van den Hout W; Gussekloo J Age Ageing; 2016 Jan; 45(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 26764392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]