These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1174321)

  • 1. [A new method for calculating a compensation function in power series].
    Haberland G
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1975 Jun; 25(6):861-2. PubMed ID: 1174321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative optical refractive biometry for intraocular lens power estimation without axial length and keratometry measurements.
    Ianchulev T; Salz J; Hoffer K; Albini T; Hsu H; Labree L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 16129287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: Estimating the corneal refractive power.
    Awwad ST; Manasseh C; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; Verity S; Mootha V; McCulley JP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1070-6. PubMed ID: 18571071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating regression formulas and kernel functions into locally adaptive knowledge-based neural networks: a case study on renal function evaluation.
    Song Q; Kasabov N; Ma T; Marshall MR
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Mar; 36(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 16213694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of the method of kernel estimation by local polynomial approximation of the empirical distribution function and its application to empirical regression.
    Schmerling S; Peil J
    Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1986; 132(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 3710112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Locally adjusted linear regression and its possibilities for application].
    Schmerling S; Peil J
    Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1983; 129(4):395-408. PubMed ID: 6642180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
    Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pursuit of unknown Periods in chronobiology.
    Scharf JH
    Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1982; 128(3):290-323. PubMed ID: 7129064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative tests for comparing normal distribution parameters based on logistic regression.
    Mantel N; Brown C
    Biometrics; 1974 Sep; 30(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 4411927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Employment of time series theory in experimental medicine (author's transl)].
    Mager PP
    Acta Histochem; 1974; 49(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 4214073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Easy-to-use, accurate and flexible individualized Bayesian limited sampling method without fixed time points for ciclosporin monitoring after liver transplantation.
    Langers P; Cremers SC; den Hartigh J; Rijnbeek EM; Ringers J; Lamers CB; van Hoek B
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Mar; 21(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 15740538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison ot two methods of measurements of the same substance: an evaluation of some statistical procedures.
    Lubran MM
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1982; 12(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 7073238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK.
    Wang L; Booth MA; Koch DD
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1825-31. PubMed ID: 15465542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint regression analysis of correlated data using Gaussian copulas.
    Song PX; Li M; Yuan Y
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 18510653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unraveling the mystique of power analysis.
    Rudy EB; Kerr M
    Heart Lung; 1991 Sep; 20(5 Pt 1):517-22. PubMed ID: 1894533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing non-nested regression models.
    Royston P; Thompson SG
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):114-27. PubMed ID: 7766768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic refractive surgery: theoretical comparison of different methods.
    Savini G; Barboni P; Zanini M
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Aug; 113(8):1271-82. PubMed ID: 16769117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing influence in regression analysis with censored data.
    Escobar LA; Meeker WQ
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):507-28. PubMed ID: 1637975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.
    Freedman LS; Fainberg V; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 15032787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Relation of 2 attributes and use of linear regression equations].
    Smirnov VS
    Zh Obshch Biol; 1971; 32(6):693-8. PubMed ID: 5157492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.