These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. Lepor H; Nieder AM; Ferrandino MN J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1729-33. PubMed ID: 11586211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Singh A; Fagin R; Shah G; Shekarriz B J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):552-4. PubMed ID: 15643251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Brown JA; Garlitz C; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Diamond SM; Strup SE Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15082005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution. Tse E; Knaus R Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reality or dream?]. Fornara P; Zacharias M Aktuelle Urol; 2004 Sep; 35(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 15368129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status. Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies]. Pereira Arias JG; Gamarra Quintanilla M; Leibar Tamayo A; Astobieta Odriozola A; Ibarluzea González G Actas Urol Esp; 2010 May; 34(5):428-39. PubMed ID: 20470715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Cathala N; Vallancien G J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):908-11. PubMed ID: 16093985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications of laparoscopic surgery for urological cancer: a single institution analysis. Colombo JR; Haber GP; Jelovsek JE; Nguyen M; Fergany A; Desai MM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):786-91. PubMed ID: 17631354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]