These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11744442)

  • 1. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium.
    Partin AW; Mangold LA; Lamm DM; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Pearson JD
    Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 11744442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.
    Makarov DV; Trock BJ; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 17572194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
    Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
    BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011.
    Eifler JB; Feng Z; Lin BM; Partin MT; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Trock BJ; Partin AW
    BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22834909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update.
    Partin AW; Kattan MW; Subong EN; Walsh PC; Wojno KJ; Oesterling JE; Scardino PT; Pearson JD
    JAMA; 1997 May; 277(18):1445-51. PubMed ID: 9145716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of patient-specific risk and percentile cohort risk of pathological stage outcome using continuous prostate-specific antigen measurement, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score.
    Huang Y; Isharwal S; Haese A; Chun FK; Makarov DV; Feng Z; Han M; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Veltri RW
    BJU Int; 2011 May; 107(10):1562-9. PubMed ID: 20875091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complexed prostate-specific antigen as a staging tool for prostate cancer: a prospective study in 420 men.
    Sokoll LJ; Mangold LA; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Bruzek DJ; Dunn W; Mohr P; Wallerson G; Chan DW
    Urology; 2002 Oct; 60(4 Suppl 1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12384158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probability of biochemical recurrence by analysis of pathologic stage, Gleason score, and margin status for localized prostate cancer.
    Khan MA; Partin AW; Mangold LA; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
    Urology; 2003 Nov; 62(5):866-71. PubMed ID: 14624910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are prostate carcinoma clinical stages T1c and T2 similar?
    Billis A; Magna LA; Watanabe IC; Costa MV; Telles GH; Ferreira U
    Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 16650293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of the biopsy Gleason score on PSA outcome for prostate cancer patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/ml and T1c,2a: implications for patient selection for prostate-only therapy.
    D'Amico AV; Renshaw AA; Schultz D; Rocha S; Richie JP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):847-51. PubMed ID: 10571188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy-based staging, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score in prediction of final pathologic diagnosis in prostate cancer.
    Narayan P; Gajendran V; Taylor SP; Tewari A; Presti JC; Leidich R; Lo R; Palmer K; Shinohara K; Spaulding JT
    Urology; 1995 Aug; 46(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 7542823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The 1992 TNM classification of T2 prostate cancer predicts pathologic stage and prognosis better than the revised 1997 classification].
    Koh H; Maru N; Muramoto M; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT; Ohori M
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jul; 93(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 12174634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing patient selection for dose escalation techniques using the prostate-specific antigen level, biopsy gleason score, and clinical T-stage.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Renshaw AA; Tomaszewski JE; Richie JP; Wein A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1227-33. PubMed ID: 10613317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Substratification of stage T1C prostate cancer based on the probability of biochemical recurrence.
    Gretzer MB; Epstein JI; Pound CR; Walsh PC; Partin AW
    Urology; 2002 Dec; 60(6):1034-9. PubMed ID: 12475665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
    Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nomograms for the prediction of pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men.
    Song C; Kang T; Ro JY; Lee MS; Kim CS; Ahn H
    J Korean Med Sci; 2005 Apr; 20(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 15831998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between percent positive biopsies and biochemical outcome after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinically organ-confined carcinoma of the prostate gland.
    Merrick GS; Butler WM; Galbreath RW; Lief JH; Adamovich E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(3):664-73. PubMed ID: 11849788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Han M; Partin AW; Zahurak M; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 12544300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.