BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11745052)

  • 21. [Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting].
    Simek M; Bruk V; Nemec P; Santavý P; Fluger I
    Rozhl Chir; 2006 May; 85(5):211-5. PubMed ID: 16805335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Markar SR; Kutty R; Edmonds L; Sadat U; Nair S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 19942633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Endoscopic vein harvest in coronary bypass].
    Jensen LK; Dimo B; Steinbrüchel DA
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Feb; 169(9):812-5. PubMed ID: 17355847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Saphenous vein harvest with SaphLITE system versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study.
    Wang S; Tang H; Wilkinson V; Lukat T; Gelfand ET; Koshal A; Modry DL; Mullen JC; Hao C; Finegan BA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):2018-23. PubMed ID: 15919302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Endoscopic harvesting of the vena saphena magna for peripheral vascular reconstruction].
    Meyer A; Omlor G; Fischbein J; Alemdar C
    Zentralbl Chir; 1999; 124(10):950-4. PubMed ID: 10596057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A reduction in the invasiveness during surgical revascularization: the harvesting of the great saphenous vein by a video endoscopic technic].
    Terrini A; Graffigna A; Martinelli L
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2000 May; 1(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 10834133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is minimally invasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique?
    Rao C; Aziz O; Deeba S; Chow A; Jones C; Ni Z; Papastavrou L; Rahman S; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 18374760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting.
    Reed JF
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2008 Dec; 7(4):210-9. PubMed ID: 18815201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Harvesting of an internal saphenous graft for aorto-coronary bypass using video-surgery].
    Folliguet T; Severac-Bastide R; Le Bret E; Temkine J; Dibie A; Philippe F; Czitrom D; Laborde F
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1999 Jul; 92(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 10443306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest with the SaphLITE system.
    O-Yurvati AH; Martin AK; Peska D
    Int Surg; 2005; 90(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15912895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Kiaii B; Moon BC; Massel D; Langlois Y; Austin TW; Willoughby A; Guiraudon C; Howard CR; Guo LR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 123(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 11828277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Endoscopic vein harvest techniques for coronary and infrainguinal bypass.
    Weiss VJ; Lin P; Lumsden AB
    Semin Laparosc Surg; 1999 Sep; 6(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 10528062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neurologic sequelae of the donor arm after endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvesting.
    Bleiziffer S; Hettich I; Eisenhauer B; Ruzicka D; Voss B; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 136(3):681-7. PubMed ID: 18805272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive vein harvesting with the SaphLITE retractor system: is it really better?
    Feyrer R; Seitz T; Strecker T; Purbojo A; Fischlein T; Weyand M; Harig F
    Heart Surg Forum; 2006; 9(1):E511-4. PubMed ID: 16401537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of endoscopic versus traditional saphenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Allen KB; Heimansohn DA; Robison RJ; Schier JJ; Griffith GL; Fitzgerald EB
    Heart Surg Forum; 2003; 6(6):E143-5. PubMed ID: 14722001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of and risk factors for surgical wound infection in the saphenous vein harvesting leg in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass.
    Swenne CL; Borowiec J; Carlsson M; Lindholm C
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 54(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 16902876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Financial impact of endoscopic vein harvest for infrainguinal bypass.
    Illig KA; Rhodes JM; Sternbach Y; Green RM
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 37(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 12563202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Endoscopic versus minimally invasive vein harvesting. Impact on leg-related morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year follow-up of a prospective trial.
    Simek M; Nemec P; Gwozdziewicz M; Langova K; Studentova H; Bruk V; Hajek R; Lonsky V
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Oct; 49(5):673-8. PubMed ID: 18670386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Traditional versus endoscopic saphenous vein stripping: a prospective randomized pilot trial.
    Assadian A; Wickenhauser G; Hübl W; Wiltos B; Sami A; Senekowitsch C; Hagmüller GW
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Nov; 36(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 18718770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Novel treatment strategy for leg and sternal wound complications after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: bioengineered Apligraf.
    Allie DE; Hebert CJ; Lirtzman MD; Wyatt CH; Keller VA; Souther SM; Allie AA; Mitran EV; Walker CM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Aug; 78(2):673-8; discussion 678. PubMed ID: 15276544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.