274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11745305)
21. Patterns of failure and prognostic factor analyses in locally advanced cervical cancer patients staged by positron emission tomography and treated with curative intent.
Narayan K; Fisher RJ; Bernshaw D; Shakher R; Hicks RJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Jul; 19(5):912-8. PubMed ID: 19574784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of prognostic variables, development of predictive models, and stratification of risk groups in surgically treated FIGO early-stage (IA-IIA) carcinoma cervix.
Singh P; Tripcony L; Nicklin J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21997176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of criteria for ovarian preservation in cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis.
Hu T; Wu L; Xing H; Yang R; Li X; Huang K; Jia Y; Zhang Q; Chen Z; Wang S; Liu D; Han X; Lin Z; Qu P; Cai H; Song X; Tian X; Wang H; Wang S; Xie X; Li S; Ma D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 23054110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic significance of histology and positive lymph node involvement following radical hysterectomy in carcinoma of the cervix.
Macdonald OK; Chen J; Dodson M; Lee CM; Gaffney DK
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 32(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 19451800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy.
Kim YB; Kim GE; Cho NH; Pyo HR; Shim SJ; Chang SK; Park HC; Suh CO; Park TK; Kim BS
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 12209745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of biological behavior between early-stage adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Fregnani JH; Soares FA; Novik PR; Lopes A; Latorre MR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Feb; 136(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 17125903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evidence of perineural invasion on early-stage cervical cancer and prognostic significance].
Zhang G; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Cui L; Jia S; Shi Y; Song S; Xu S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 50(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 26675394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Postoperative radiotherapy in early stage carcinoma of the uterine cervix: treatment results and prognostic factors.
Yeh SA; Wan Leung S; Wang CJ; Chen HC
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jan; 72(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9889023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Prognostic significance of pretreatment serum CA 125, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in relation to clinical and histopathologic tumor characteristics.
Duk JM; De Bruijn HW; Groenier KH; Fleuren GJ; Aalders JG
Cancer; 1990 Apr; 65(8):1830-7. PubMed ID: 2317761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.
Zhou J; Wu SG; Sun JY; Li FY; Lin HX; Chen QH; He ZY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 143(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 27646608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic Significance of Pre-treatment Serum C-Reactive Protein Level in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.
Bodner-Adler B; Kimberger O; Schneidinger C; Kölbl H; Bodner K
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4691-6. PubMed ID: 27630314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective malignancy grading, flow cytometry DNA-measurements and adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Willén R; Himmelmann A; Långström-Einarsson E; Fernö M; Ranstam J; Baldetorp B; Skjaerris J; Prien-Larsen J; Tropé C; Stendahl U
Anticancer Res; 1993; 13(4):1187-96. PubMed ID: 8352543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An analysis of cell type in patients with surgically staged stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Look KY; Brunetto VL; Clarke-Pearson DL; Averette HE; Major FJ; Alvarez RD; Homesley HD; Zaino RJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Dec; 63(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 8946863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of prognoses of pathologic stage Ib adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Nakanishi T; Ishikawa H; Suzuki Y; Inoue T; Nakamura S; Kuzuya K
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 11063659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
Ma R; Zhang H; Zou L; Qu Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 25877610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: prognostic significance of clinicopathologic parameters, flow cytometry analysis and HPV infection.
Dabić MM; Nola M; Tomicić I; Dotlić S; Petrovecki M; Jukić S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 18307079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009.
Zhang Y; Ding J; Hua K
J Int Med Res; 2022 Jan; 50(1):3000605211067397. PubMed ID: 34986672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma.
Farley JH; Hickey KW; Carlson JW; Rose GS; Kost ER; Harrison TA
Cancer; 2003 May; 97(9):2196-202. PubMed ID: 12712471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differential cyclooxygenase-2 expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kim YB; Kim GE; Pyo HR; Cho NH; Keum KC; Lee CG; Seong J; Suh CO; Park TK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):822-9. PubMed ID: 15465199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
