223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11745804)
1. Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens for duct carcinoma of the breast: correlation with core biopsy and mammographic findings.
Mai KT; Chaudhuri M; Perkins DG; Mirsky D
J Surg Oncol; 2001 Nov; 78(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 11745804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of extent and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ in radiologically guided core biopsy for the status of margins in lumpectomy specimens.
Mai KT; Yazdi HM; Ford JC; Matzinger FR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Nov; 26(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 11078610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens of infiltrating lobular carcinoma.
Mai KT; Yazdi HM; Isotalo PA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2000 Mar; 60(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 10845806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinicopathologic significance of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies with invasive cancer.
Jimenez RE; Bongers S; Bouwman D; Segel M; Visscher DW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Jan; 24(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 10632496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extent of lumpectomy for breast cancer after diagnosis by stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy.
Al-Sobhi SS; Helvie MA; Pass HA; Chang AE
Ann Surg Oncol; 1999 Jun; 6(4):330-5. PubMed ID: 10379852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ductal carcinoma in situ. The success of breast conservation therapy: a shared experience of two single institutional nonrandomized prospective studies.
Lagios MD; Silverstein MJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 9115503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of positive margins after breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective review.
Saadai P; Moezzi M; Menes T
Breast Cancer; 2011 Jul; 18(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 21465227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial margin status for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and subsequent identification of carcinoma in reexcision specimens.
Skripenova S; Layfield LJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jan; 134(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20073613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy.
Liberman L; LaTrenta LR; Van Zee KJ; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 9169687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of infiltrating lobular carcinoma with positive surgical margins after breast-conservation therapy.
Moore MM; Borossa G; Imbrie JZ; Fechner RE; Harvey JA; Slingluff CL; Adams RB; Hanks JB
Ann Surg; 2000 Jun; 231(6):877-82. PubMed ID: 10816631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal carcinoma in situ detected in the mammographic era: an analysis of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting outcome with breast-conserving therapy.
Vicini FA; Lacerna MD; Goldstein NS; Horwitz EM; Dmuchowski CF; White JR; Gustafson GS; Ingold JA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Oct; 39(3):627-35. PubMed ID: 9336142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Identification of surgical margins by intraoperative mammography of quadrantectomys specimens for breast cancer and histopathological comparison].
Peña Ayón AR; Mainero Ratchelous FE; Vargas Solano JM; Buenrostro Pineda MA; Bernechea Miranda A; Burgos Portillo I; Aguilar Gallegos UI; Balcázar Rodríguez J
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2007 Oct; 75(10):588-602. PubMed ID: 18800577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
