These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11745837)
1. Effective coding in birth defects surveillance. Rasmussen SA; Moore CA Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S3-7. PubMed ID: 11745837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs? Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida. Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinician reviewers in birth defects surveillance programs: survey of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Lin AE; Forrester MB; Cunniff C; Higgins CA; Anderka M Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):781-6. PubMed ID: 17051528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services. Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collection, use, and protection of population-based birth defects surveillance data in the united states. Mai CT; Law DJ; Mason CA; McDowell BD; Meyer RE; Musa D; Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Dec; 79(12):811-4. PubMed ID: 18064713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A population-based surveillance system on birth defects and its application]. Li S; Hong S; Wang T Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Jun; 22(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 11860869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical geneticists in birth defects surveillance and epidemiology research programs: past, present and future roles. Lin AE; Rasmussen SA; Scheuerle A; Stevenson RE Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2009 Jan; 85(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 19107957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India. Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data. Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using ICD-9 codes to establish prevalence of malformations in newborn infants. Holmes LB; Westgate MN Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2012 Apr; 94(4):208-14. PubMed ID: 22451461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geocoding capacity of birth defects surveillance programs: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Geocoding Survey. Wang Y; O'Leary LA; Rickard RS; Mason CA; J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20795566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Random error and undercounting in birth defects surveillance data: implications for inference. Correa-VillaseƱor A; Satten GA; Rolka H; Langlois P; Devine O Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 14703782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths. Duke W; Williams L; Correa A Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 18985684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Department of Defense Birth Defects Registry: overview of a new surveillance system. Ryan MA; Pershyn-Kisor MA; Honner WK; Smith TC; Reed RJ; Gray GC Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S26-9. PubMed ID: 11745841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Application of capture-mark-recapture method on evaluating the abilities of birth defects surveillance systems]. Yin XQ; Li YM; Luo JY; Shi XJ; Yin T; Huang R; Chen J Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 29(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 18686856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the quality of surveillance data on congenital heart defects in the metropolitan Atlanta congenital defects program. Riehle-Colarusso T; Strickland MJ; Reller MD; Mahle WT; Botto LD; Siffel C; Atkinson M; Correa A Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):743-53. PubMed ID: 17990334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Birth defects interstate data exchange: a battle worth fighting? Cassell C; Mai C; Rickard R Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):806-10. PubMed ID: 17990342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of geographic information systems in birth defects surveillance and research. Siffel C; Strickland MJ; Gardner BR; Kirby RS; Correa A Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 17094141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects. Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]