166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11745842)
1. Process of and problems in changing a birth defects registry reporting system.
Druschel C; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross P
Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S30-6. PubMed ID: 11745842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects.
Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a web-based integrated birth defects surveillance system in New York State.
Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Le LH; Steen PM; Babcock GD; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 18849767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementing a web-based case reporting and communication system among hospitals reporting to the birth defects registry in New York State.
Steen PM; Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E11-6. PubMed ID: 18849768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State.
Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK; Hwang SA; Gensburg LJ
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS): effectiveness of a passive birth defects registry system.
Fox DJ; Druschel CM
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):604-8. PubMed ID: 14703781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of CUSUM and Shewhart charts to monitor regional trends of birth defect reports in New York State.
Babcock GD; Talbot TO; Rogerson PA; Forand SP
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):669-78. PubMed ID: 16240377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up survey of parents of children with major birth defects in New York State.
Sharpe-Stimac M; Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 70(9):597-602. PubMed ID: 15368559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.
Miller E
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electronic clinical laboratory reports as a source for ascertaining and confirming chromosomal anomalies reported to the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry.
Tao Z; Wang Y; Dicesare DK; Chang HG; Steen PM; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(2):E17-24. PubMed ID: 23358302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Department of Defense Birth Defects Registry: overview of a new surveillance system.
Ryan MA; Pershyn-Kisor MA; Honner WK; Smith TC; Reed RJ; Gray GC
Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S26-9. PubMed ID: 11745841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the hospital discharge diagnoses index and the birth certificate as sources of information on birth defects.
Hexter AC; Harris JA; Roeper P; Croen LA; Krueger P; Gant D
Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 2113690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using birth defects registry data to evaluate infant and childhood mortality associated with birth defects: an alternative to traditional mortality assessment using underlying cause of death statistics.
Copeland GE; Kirby RS
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):792-7. PubMed ID: 17990340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wisconsin Birth Defects Registry collecting data.
Oftedahl E; Pauli RM; Fleischfresser S; Katcher ML
WMJ; 2004; 103(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 15553556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A survey on readiness and needs regarding the transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM.
Wang Y; Tao Z; Fox D; Steen P; Druschel CM
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 24400373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Birth defects ascertainment in the Philippines.
Padilla- CD; Cutiongco EM; Sia JM
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():239-43. PubMed ID: 15906745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
