BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11746011)

  • 1. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A more powerful robust sib-pair test of linkage for quantitative traits.
    Amos CI; Elston RC; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(3):435-49. PubMed ID: 2753353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
    Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits.
    Putter H; Sandkuijl LA; van Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 22(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 11984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait Loci with missing completely at random genotype data.
    Fan R; Liu L; Jung J; Zhong M
    Behav Genet; 2008 May; 38(3):316-36. PubMed ID: 18306033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matrix representation of the Haseman-Elston method.
    Drigalenko E
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Apr; 55(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 10329515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive analysis of complex traits in problem 2A.
    Juo SH; Beaty TH; Duffy DL; Maestri NE; Prenger VL; Zeiger J; Lei HH; Coresh J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 9433583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Score test for mapping quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size when the dominance effect is not negligible.
    Wang K; Huang J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):398-412. PubMed ID: 12432506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power and robustness of a score test for linkage analysis of quantitative traits using identity by descent data on sib pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 May; 20(4):415-31. PubMed ID: 11319783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the type I error rate of model-free linkage analysis.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Elston RC; Weissbecker K; Keats BJ; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 10799971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of smoothing techniques in the interpretation of results from genomic scans using sib-pair data.
    Siegmund KD; Todorov AA; Rao DC; Borecki IB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1047-52. PubMed ID: 9433622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative trait linkage analysis by generalized estimating equations: unification of variance components and Haseman-Elston regression.
    Chen WM; Broman KW; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15095386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Locating disease genes using Bayesian variable selection with the Haseman-Elston method.
    Oh C; Ye KQ; He Q; Mendell NR
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S69. PubMed ID: 14975137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of methods incorporating quantitative covariates into affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Tsai HJ; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 16355406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient, robust and unified method for mapping complex traits (III): combined linkage/linkage-disequilibrium analysis.
    Zhao LP; Quiaoit F; Aragaki C; Hsu L
    Am J Med Genet; 1999 Jun; 84(5):433-53. PubMed ID: 10360398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistically robust approaches for sib-pair linkage analysis.
    Wang J; Guerra R; Cohen J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 62(Pt 4):349-59. PubMed ID: 9924612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power of a score test for quantitative trait linkage analysis of relative pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S85-91. PubMed ID: 11055375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.