These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1174623)

  • 1. Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait.
    Fleiss JL
    Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):651-9. PubMed ID: 1174623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data.
    King TS; Chinchilli VM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2131-47. PubMed ID: 11439426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of children's stuttered and nonstuttered speech by highly experienced judges: binary judgments and comparisons with disfluency-types definitions.
    Bothe AK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 18658057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Measuring agreement between 2 observers: a quantitative case].
    Fermanian J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1984; 32(6):408-13. PubMed ID: 6531504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direction of wording and responses to items in oral health-related quality of life questionnaires for children and their parents.
    Locker D; Jokovic A; Allison P
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 35(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 17615012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing intergroup concordance in ranking experiments with two groups of judges.
    Dekle DJ; Leung DH; Zhu M
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 18331154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement measurement and the judgment process.
    Janes CL
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1979 Jun; 167(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 376781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies.
    Karelaia N; Hogarth RM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 134(3):404-26. PubMed ID: 18444703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].
    Reine G; Lancon C; Simeoni MC; Duplan S; Auquier P
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 14567165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative analysis of three approaches for rater agreement].
    Ato M; Benavente A; López JJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 17296098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian view of covariation assessment.
    McKenzie CR; Mikkelsen LA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):33-61. PubMed ID: 16764849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling kappa for measuring dependent categorical agreement data.
    Williamson JM; Lipsitz SR; Manatunga AK
    Biostatistics; 2000 Jun; 1(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 12933519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bivariate modeling of interobserver agreement coefficients.
    Shoukri MM; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):430-40. PubMed ID: 18645986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical agreement in quantitative measurements.
    Indrayan A; Chawla R
    Natl Med J India; 1994; 7(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 7827605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Main-effects model is a special kind of additive model in the presence of linkage disequilibrium.
    Zhang Y; Ji L
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 18931506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the concordance correlation coefficient when examining agreement in dyadic research.
    Quinn C; Haber MJ; Pan Y
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19752677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous estimation of intrarater and interrater agreement for multiple raters under order restrictions for a binary trait.
    Lester Kirchner H; Lemke JH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1761-72. PubMed ID: 12111910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random effects in paired-comparison experiments using the Bradley-Terry model.
    Lancaster JF; Quade D
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):245-9. PubMed ID: 6871353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. QROC curves and kappa functions: new methods for evaluating the quality of clinical decisions.
    Gilchrist J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):350-60. PubMed ID: 1454373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kappa coefficients in medical research.
    Chmura Kraemer H; Periyakoil VS; Noda A
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(14):2109-29. PubMed ID: 12111890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.