These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11746313)

  • 1. Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Giraudeau B; Mary JY
    Stat Med; 2001 Nov; 20(21):3205-14. PubMed ID: 11746313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance.
    Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3972-81. PubMed ID: 22764084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence interval construction for a difference between two dependent intraclass correlation coefficients.
    Ramasundarahettige CF; Donner A; Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1041-53. PubMed ID: 19142855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for within-person variation: implications for study design and hypothesis testing.
    Rosner B; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Feb; 127(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 3337089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A modified large-sample approach to approximate interval estimation for a particular intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Cappelleri JC; Ting N
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1861-77. PubMed ID: 12754721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for the difference in the success rates of two treatments in the analysis of correlated binary responses.
    Saha KK; Wang S
    Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):983-1002. PubMed ID: 30843251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
    Cheng Y; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival endpoints and adaptive designs.
    Bauer P
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):730-1. PubMed ID: 16972725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination.
    Browne RH
    Stat Med; 1995 Sep; 14(17):1933-40. PubMed ID: 8532986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.
    Walter SD; Eliasziw M; Donner A
    Stat Med; 1998 Jan; 17(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 9463853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Ukoumunne OC; Davison AC; Gulliford MC; Chinn S
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models.
    Quan H; Shih WJ
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1195-203. PubMed ID: 8962450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Introduction of a User-oriented Application for Biometrical Sample Size Calculation in Clinical and Epidemiological Trials].
    Geis B; Tulka S; Knippschild S; Krummenauer F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2021 Feb; 238(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 31117147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting where future means will lie based on the results of the current trial.
    Julious SA; Campbell MJ; Walters SJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 17368114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive vs. group sequential self-designing trials.
    Mehrotra DV; Fan X
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):710-2; discussion 713. PubMed ID: 16972723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeated confidence intervals in self-designing clinical trials and switching between noninferiority and superiority.
    Hartung J; Knapp G
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):697-709. PubMed ID: 16972722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.
    Fosgate GT
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2857-66. PubMed ID: 16134167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.