186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11747008)
1. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions.
Köhler U; Marshall I; Robertson MB; Long Q; Xu XY; Hoskins PR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Nov; 14(5):563-73. PubMed ID: 11747008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions.
Papathanasopoulou P; Zhao S; Köhler U; Robertson MB; Long Q; Hoskins P; Xu XY; Marshall I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12541221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models.
Marshall I; Zhao S; Papathanasopoulou P; Hoskins P; Xu Y
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15046997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom.
Zhao SZ; Papathanasopoulou P; Long Q; Marshall I; Xu XY
Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 31(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12918911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries.
Cibis M; Potters WV; Gijsen FJ; Marquering H; vanBavel E; van der Steen AF; Nederveen AJ; Wentzel JJ
NMR Biomed; 2014 Jul; 27(7):826-34. PubMed ID: 24817676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative comparison of CFD predicted and MRI measured velocity fields in a carotid bifurcation phantom.
Long Q; Xu XY; Köhler U; Robertson MB; Marshall I; Hoskins P
Biorheology; 2002; 39(3-4):467-74. PubMed ID: 12122268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI.
Potters WV; van Ooij P; Marquering H; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 41(2):505-16. PubMed ID: 24436246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI.
Steinman DA; Thomas JB; Ladak HM; Milner JS; Rutt BK; Spence JD
Magn Reson Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 11754454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice of in vivo versus idealized velocity boundary conditions influences physiologically relevant flow patterns in a subject-specific simulation of flow in the human carotid bifurcation.
Wake AK; Oshinski JN; Tannenbaum AR; Giddens DP
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):021013. PubMed ID: 19102572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review.
Szajer J; Ho-Shon K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 48():62-69. PubMed ID: 29223732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image-based carotid flow reconstruction: a comparison between MRI and ultrasound.
Glor FP; Ariff B; Hughes AD; Crowe LA; Verdonck PR; Barratt DC; McG Thom SA; Firmin DN; Xu XY
Physiol Meas; 2004 Dec; 25(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 15712727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a System for Measuring Wall Shear Stress in Blood Vessels using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Yoshida K; Nagao T; Okada K; Miyazaki S; Yang X; Yamazaki Y; Murase K
Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 27(3):136-49. PubMed ID: 18367824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary study of hemodynamics in human carotid bifurcation by computational fluid dynamics combined with magnetic resonance angiography.
Xue Y; Gao P; Lin Y; Dai C
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):788-97. PubMed ID: 17729012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the coupling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity measurements with computational fluid dynamics in a U bend.
Glor FP; Westenberg JJ; Vierendeels J; Danilouchkine M; Verdonck P
Artif Organs; 2002 Jul; 26(7):622-35. PubMed ID: 12081521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of anesthesia and fluid-structure interaction on simulated shear stress patterns in the carotid bifurcation of mice.
De Wilde D; Trachet B; De Meyer G; Segers P
J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2741-2747. PubMed ID: 27342001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of shear stress on the wall of the carotid artery using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics.
Yim P; Demarco K; Castro MA; Cebral J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 113():412-42. PubMed ID: 15923751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of inlet velocity profiles on patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations of the carotid bifurcation.
Campbell IC; Ries J; Dhawan SS; Quyyumi AA; Taylor WR; Oshinski JN
J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):051001. PubMed ID: 22757489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects.
Milner JS; Moore JA; Rutt BK; Steinman DA
J Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 28(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 9685141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
