These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11747028)

  • 1. Assessing the accuracy of two-dimensional phase-contrast MRI measurements of complex unsteady flows.
    Papaharilaou Y; Doorly DJ; Sherwin SJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Dec; 14(6):714-23. PubMed ID: 11747028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of MR phase contrast velocity measurements for unsteady flow.
    Frayne R; Steinman DA; Ethier CR; Rutt BK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 7549205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative analysis of PC MRI velocity maps: pulsatile flow in cylindrical vessels.
    Robertson MB; Köhler U; Hoskins PR; Marshall I
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jun; 19(5):685-95. PubMed ID: 11672627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation of phase contrast MRI of turbulent flow.
    Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Gårdhagen R; Karlsson M; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Oct; 64(4):1039-46. PubMed ID: 20574963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physics-driven CFD modeling of complex anatomical cardiovascular flows-a TCPC case study.
    Pekkan K; de Zélicourt D; Ge L; Sotiropoulos F; Frakes D; Fogel MA; Yoganathan AP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 33(3):284-300. PubMed ID: 15868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of 4D flow MRI's quality by verifying its Navier-Stokes compatibility.
    Garay J; Mella H; Sotelo J; Cárcamo C; Uribe S; Bertoglio C; Mura J
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jun; 38(6):e3603. PubMed ID: 35434919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use of optical flow methods with spin-tagging magnetic resonance imaging.
    Moser KW; Georgiadis JG; Buckius RO
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Jan; 29(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 11219511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of magnetic resonance velocimetry for steady flow.
    Ku DN; Biancheri CL; Pettigrew RI; Peifer JW; Markou CP; Engels H
    J Biomech Eng; 1990 Nov; 112(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 2273875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Spatial Resolution in Three-dimensional Cine Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Accuracy of Hemodynamic Analysis.
    Fukuyama A; Isoda H; Morita K; Mori M; Watanabe T; Ishiguro K; Komori Y; Kosugi T
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):311-316. PubMed ID: 28132996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation of branching blood flows on parallel computers.
    Yue X; Hwang FN; Shandas R; Cai XC
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():325-30. PubMed ID: 15133979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large eddy simulation in a rotary blood pump: Viscous shear stress computation and comparison with unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulation.
    Torner B; Konnigk L; Hallier S; Kumar J; Witte M; Wurm FH
    Int J Artif Organs; 2018 Nov; 41(11):752-763. PubMed ID: 29898615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.
    Kidher E; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25488105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of CFD and MRI flow and velocities in an in vitro large artery bypass graft model.
    Ku JP; Elkins CJ; Taylor CA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 33(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 15868717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical simulation of local blood flow in the carotid and cerebral arteries under altered gravity.
    Kim CS; Kiris C; Kwak D; David T
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16524330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the accuracy of EPI-based phase contrast velocimetry.
    Moser KW; Georgiadis JG; Buckius RO
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Nov; 18(9):1115-23. PubMed ID: 11118766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-implicit numerical modeling of axially symmetric flows in compliant arterial systems.
    Casulli V; Dumbser M; Toro EF
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Feb; 28(2):257-72. PubMed ID: 25099329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects.
    Milner JS; Moore JA; Rutt BK; Steinman DA
    J Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 28(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 9685141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative pressure estimation from velocity measurements in blood flows: State-of-the-art and new approaches.
    Bertoglio C; Nuñez R; Galarce F; Nordsletten D; Osses A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 28884520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical study on the effect of secondary flow in the human aorta on local shear stresses in abdominal aortic branches.
    Shipkowitz T; Rodgers VG; Frazin LJ; Chandran KB
    J Biomech; 2000 Jun; 33(6):717-28. PubMed ID: 10807993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.