These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11747028)

  • 41. Numerical validation of MR-measurement-integrated simulation of blood flow in a cerebral aneurysm.
    Funamoto K; Suzuki Y; Hayase T; Kosugi T; Isoda H
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Jun; 37(6):1105-16. PubMed ID: 19350390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of segmented MR velocity mapping to measure small vessel pulsatile flow in a phantom simulating cardiac motion.
    Arheden H; Saeed M; Törnqvist E; Lund G; Wendland MF; Higgins CB; Ståhlberg F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 May; 13(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 11329193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A numerical and experimental analysis of the flow field in a two-dimensional model of the human carotid artery bifurcation.
    Rindt CC; vd Vosse FN; Steenhoven AA; Janssen JD; Reneman RS
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(5):499-509. PubMed ID: 3611124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A model of pulsatile flow in a uniform deformable vessel.
    Johnson GA; Borovetz HS; Anderson JL
    J Biomech; 1992 Jan; 25(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 1733987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Blood flow in the cerebral venous system: modeling and simulation.
    Miraucourt O; Salmon S; Szopos M; Thiriet M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Apr; 20(5):471-482. PubMed ID: 27802781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Phase-contrast MRI with hybrid one and two-sided flow-encoding and velocity spectrum separation.
    Wang D; Shao J; Ennis DB; Hu P
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):182-192. PubMed ID: 27504987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Numerical simulation of blood pulsatile flow in a stenosed carotid artery using different rheological models.
    Razavi A; Shirani E; Sadeghi MR
    J Biomech; 2011 Jul; 44(11):2021-30. PubMed ID: 21696742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Coronary flow quantification by Fourier velocity encoded MRI.
    Baltes Ch; Kozerke S; Boesiger P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1():412-5. PubMed ID: 12451879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography.
    Gabbour M; Schnell S; Jarvis K; Robinson JD; Markl M; Rigsby CK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 25487721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Time resolved velocity measurements of unsteady systems using spiral imaging.
    Tayler AB; Holland DJ; Sederman AJ; Gladden LF
    J Magn Reson; 2011 Jul; 211(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21514194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Multi-VENC acquisition of four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI to improve precision of velocity field measurement.
    Ha H; Kim GB; Kweon J; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH; Lee SJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 May; 75(5):1909-19. PubMed ID: 26059014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pulsatile magneto-hydrodynamic blood flows through porous blood vessels using a third grade non-Newtonian fluids model.
    Akbarzadeh P
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():3-19. PubMed ID: 26792174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Numerical simulation of unsteady laminar flow through a tilting disk heart valve: prediction of vortex shedding.
    Huang ZJ; Merkle CL; Abdallah S; Tarbell JM
    J Biomech; 1994 Apr; 27(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 8188720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and Laser Doppler Anemometry velocity measurements downstream of replacement heart valves: implications for in vivo assessment of prosthetic valve function.
    Fontaine AA; Heinrich RS; Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Scheidegger MB; Boesiger P; Walton SP; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 8834728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Numerical study of wall mechanics and fluid dynamics in end-to-side anastomoses and correlation to intimal hyperplasia.
    Hofer M; Rappitsch G; Perktold K; Trubel W; Schima H
    J Biomech; 1996 Oct; 29(10):1297-308. PubMed ID: 8884475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A Bayesian model for highly accelerated phase-contrast MRI.
    Rich A; Potter LC; Jin N; Ash J; Simonetti OP; Ahmad R
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Aug; 76(2):689-701. PubMed ID: 26444911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow.
    Sun Y; Hearshen DO; Rankin GW; Haggar AM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 1633398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Velocity mapping of the aortic flow at 9.4 T in healthy mice and mice with induced heart failure using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI (4D PC MRI).
    Bovenkamp PR; Brix T; Lindemann F; Holtmeier R; Abdurrachim D; Kuhlmann MT; Strijkers GJ; Stypmann J; Hinrichs KH; Hoerr V
    MAGMA; 2015 Aug; 28(4):315-27. PubMed ID: 25381179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
    Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Combined analysis of spatial and velocity displacement artifacts in phase contrast measurements of complex flows.
    Steinman DA; Ethier CR; Rutt BK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 9090588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.