These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11747863)

  • 41. When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces.
    Carbon CC; Leder H
    Perception; 2005; 34(9):1117-34. PubMed ID: 16245489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.
    Sadeh B; Yovel G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):782-9. PubMed ID: 20558303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Automatic aspects in face perception: evidence from mandatory processing of distractor facial components.
    Anaki D; Nica EI; Moscovitch M
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 20382628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evidence for a size underestimation of upright faces.
    Araragi Y; Aotani T; Kitaoka A
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):840-53. PubMed ID: 23155735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Toddlers with Williams syndrome process upright but not inverted faces holistically.
    Cashon CH; Ha OR; DeNicola CA; Mervis CB
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2013 Nov; 43(11):2549-57. PubMed ID: 23494560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.
    Eastwood JD; Smilek D; Merikle PM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):1004-13. PubMed ID: 11578045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Upright and inverted faces: the right hemisphere knows the difference.
    Leehey S; Carey S; Diamond R; Cahn A
    Cortex; 1978 Sep; 14(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 710151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.
    Hussain Z; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2273-84. PubMed ID: 19555706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Added noise affects the neural correlates of upright and inverted faces differently.
    Schneider BL; DeLong JE; Busey TA
    J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(4):4. PubMed ID: 17461688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Recognition of upright and inverted faces: a correlational study.
    Phillips RJ; Rawles RE
    Perception; 1979; 8(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 503787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. What's in a face? Effects of stimulus duration and inversion on face processing in schizophrenia.
    Butler PD; Tambini A; Yovel G; Jalbrzikowski M; Ziwich R; Silipo G; Kanwisher N; Javitt DC
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Aug; 103(1-3):283-92. PubMed ID: 18450426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.
    Royer J; Willenbockel V; Blais C; Gosselin F; Lafortune S; Leclerc J; Fiset D
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 26724954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Disrupting perceptual grouping of face parts impairs holistic face processing.
    Curby KM; Goldstein RR; Blacker K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 23179914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dual-task interference patterns reveal differential processing of upright and inverted faces.
    Hillis SK; Hiscock M; Rexer JL
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Jul; 28(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 7546670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods.
    Trujillo LT; Peterson MA; Kaszniak AW; Allen JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 15589196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Viewpoint invariance in the discrimination of upright and inverted faces.
    Wright A; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2545-54. PubMed ID: 18804486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors.
    Neiworth JJ; Hassett JM; Sylvester CJ
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16909230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Holistic processing of faces: learning effects with Mooney faces.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1316-27. PubMed ID: 16197686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Importance of the inverted control in measuring holistic face processing with the composite effect and part-whole effect.
    McKone E; Davies AA; Darke H; Crookes K; Wickramariyaratne T; Zappia S; Fiorentini C; Favelle S; Broughton M; Fernando D
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():33. PubMed ID: 23382725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Revealing the mechanisms of human face perception using dynamic apertures.
    Murphy J; Cook R
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():25-35. PubMed ID: 28803219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.