These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11747937)

  • 1. European Parliament debate on human cloning collapses.
    Bosch X
    Lancet; 2001 Dec; 358(9297):1974. PubMed ID: 11747937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cloning animals and human beings.
    European Parliament
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 May; No. 128():10-1. PubMed ID: 11655043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Parliament backs human cloning ban.
    Bosch X
    Lancet; 2001 Nov; 358(9295):1785. PubMed ID: 11734241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Israeli cloning ban endorsed by scientists.
    Fishman RH
    Lancet; 1999 Jan; 353(9148):218. PubMed ID: 11657094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics can boost science.
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):275. PubMed ID: 11099003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics of cloning: who decides?
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European parliament wants world ban on human cloning.
    Watson R
    BMJ; 1997 Mar; 314(7084):847. PubMed ID: 9093090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical aspects of cloning techniques: opinion of the Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology of the European Commission.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):187-91; discussion 192-3. PubMed ID: 9532396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
    Kass LR
    New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. panel about to weigh in on rules for assisted fertility.
    Hall SS
    N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 15250081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. President asks experts for advice on the new reality of cloning.
    Purdum TS
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Feb; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European panel rejects creation of human embryos for research.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):277. PubMed ID: 11099004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical aspects of cloning techniques. Advisers to the President of the European Commission on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology.
    J Med Ethics; 1997 Dec; 23(6):349-52. PubMed ID: 9451603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commission on cloning: ready-made controversy.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Liberty, identity, and human cloning.
    Robertson JA
    Tex Law Rev; 1998 May; 76(6):1371-456. PubMed ID: 11660439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Little-known panel challenged to make quick cloning study.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():C1, C9. PubMed ID: 11647204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gene-splice oversight.
    Parens E
    Washington Post; 1996 Jun; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Japan proposes ban on human cloning.
    Watts J
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):465. PubMed ID: 11656950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ninety-day wonder.
    Haglund K
    J NIH Res; 1997 Jul; 9(7):10. PubMed ID: 11656639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.