These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11747994)

  • 1. Calibration of plane parallel ionization chambers: a new service for secondary standard dosimetry laboratories?
    Arib M; Chekerker H; Benmokhtar S; Meghzifene A
    Med Dosim; 2001; 26(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 11747994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wall correction factors for calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers with high-energy photon beams.
    Araki F; Ikeda R; Shirakawa Y; Shimonobou T; Moribe N; Takada T; Takahashi M; Oura H; Matoba M
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2509-17. PubMed ID: 11008952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of plane-parallel chambers and determination of p(wall) for the NACP and Roos chambers for 60Co gamma-ray beams.
    Palm A; Mattsson O; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 10795985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of plane-parallel chambers in electron dosimetry without any cross-calibration.
    Christ G; Dohm S; Bruggmoser G; Schüle E
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 May; 47(9):N121-6. PubMed ID: 12043825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The calibration of parallel-plate electron ionization chambers at NPL for use with the IPEM 2003 code of practice: summary data.
    Bass G; Thomas R; Pearce J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):N115-24. PubMed ID: 19305037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
    Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A proposal for the calibration of plane-parallel ion chambers by accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Attix FH
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):931-3. PubMed ID: 2233583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of methods for calibrating parallel-plate chambers/.
    Reft CS; Kuchnir FT; DeWerd LA; Micka J; Attix FH
    Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1953-7. PubMed ID: 7700203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.
    Arib M; Medjadj T; Boudouma Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 7(3):55-64. PubMed ID: 17533342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.