These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11748301)

  • 1. Routine acid decalcification of bone marrow samples can preserve DNA for FISH and CGH studies in metastatic prostate cancer.
    Brown RS; Edwards J; Bartlett JW; Jones C; Dogan A
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2002 Jan; 50(1):113-5. PubMed ID: 11748301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier.
    Alers JC; Krijtenburg PJ; Vissers KJ; van Dekken H
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1999 May; 47(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 10219063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies.
    Singh VM; Salunga RC; Huang VJ; Tran Y; Erlander M; Plumlee P; Peterson MR
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 23660273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of tissue decalcification on mRNA retention within bone for in-situ hybridization studies.
    Walsh L; Freemont AJ; Hoyland JA
    Int J Exp Pathol; 1993 Jun; 74(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 8392858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formic acid decalcification of bone marrow trephines degrades DNA: alternative use of EDTA allows the amplification and sequencing of relatively long PCR products.
    Wickham CL; Sarsfield P; Joyner MV; Jones DB; Ellard S; Wilkins B
    Mol Pathol; 2000 Dec; 53(6):336. PubMed ID: 11193054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasonic decalcification offers new perspectives for rapid FISH, DNA, and RT-PCR analysis in bone marrow trephines.
    Reineke T; Jenni B; Abdou MT; Frigerio S; Zubler P; Moch H; Tinguely M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):892-6. PubMed ID: 16819333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of decalcification protocols on immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses of bone samples.
    Miquelestorena-Standley E; Jourdan ML; Collin C; Bouvier C; Larousserie F; Aubert S; Gomez-Brouchet A; Guinebretière JM; Tallegas M; Brulin B; Le Nail LR; Tallet A; Le Loarer F; Massiere J; Galant C; de Pinieux G
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Aug; 33(8):1505-1517. PubMed ID: 32094425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IPM-FISH, a new M-FISH approach using IRS-PCR painting probes: application to the analysis of seven human prostate cell lines.
    Aurich-Costa J; Vannier A; Grégoire E; Nowak F; Cherif D
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2001 Feb; 30(2):143-60. PubMed ID: 11135431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens; an additional tool in the diagnostic armoury.
    Neat MJ; Moonim MT; Dunn RG; Geoghegan H; Foot NJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 23038690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer.
    Schrijver WA; van der Groep P; Hoefnagel LD; Ter Hoeve ND; Peeters T; Moelans CB; van Diest PJ
    Mod Pathol; 2016 Dec; 29(12):1460-1470. PubMed ID: 27562496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maintaining GFP tissue fluorescence through bone decalcification and long-term storage.
    Harms JF; Budgeon LR; Christensen ND; Welch DR
    Biotechniques; 2002 Dec; 33(6):1197-200. PubMed ID: 12503297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of immunohistochemical detection of collagen type II in osteochondral sections by comparing decalcification and antigen retrieval agent combinations.
    Amirtham SM; Ozbey O; Kachroo U; Ramasamy B; Vinod E
    Clin Anat; 2020 Apr; 33(3):343-349. PubMed ID: 31381185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Introduction of a decalcification method for bone marrow biopsy tissue].
    Peng XW; Xian M; Ban NP; Sun Q
    Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Apr; 45(4):406-409. PubMed ID: 38951072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples.
    Waissbluth S; Chan SW; Chen JZ; McIntosh M; Daniel SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 23250382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-temperature glycol methacrylate resin embedding method: A protocol suitable for bone marrow immunohistochemistry, PCR, and fish analysis.
    Zhang Q; Wang J; Wu H; Zhang L; Zhou J; Ye Q; Shao X; Guan C; Xu J; Yang Y; Zhou R; Ouyang J
    Microsc Res Tech; 2010 Oct; 73(11):1067-71. PubMed ID: 20196105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of various decalcifying agents on cartilage proteoglycans.
    Ippolito E; LaVelle S; Pedrini V
    Stain Technol; 1981 Nov; 56(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 6803402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Demonstration of trivalent iron in decalcified bone marrow specimens. Comparative study of standard Perls stain on sections and the Perls pre-reaction on fragments].
    Vigliani R
    Pathologica; 2003 Jun; 95(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 12968308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone Marrow work-up: report of a pilot study.
    Anagnostopoulos I; Lenze D; Hummel M; Dietel M; Jöhrens K
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2015; 199():95-105. PubMed ID: 25636433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations.
    Van Dekken H; Krijtenburg PJ; Alers JC
    Acta Histochem; 2000 Feb; 102(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 10726167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-Step Preservation and Decalcification of Bony Tissue for Molecular Profiling.
    Mueller C; Harpole MG; Espina V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1606():85-102. PubMed ID: 28501995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.