These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11748420)

  • 1. Measuring mortality outcomes to improve health care: rational use of ratings and rankings.
    Schneider EC
    Med Care; 2002 Jan; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11748420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factoring socioeconomic status into cardiac performance profiling for hospitals: does it matter?
    Alter DA; Austin PC; Naylor CD; Tu JV
    Med Care; 2002 Jan; 40(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 11748427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward improved coronary artery revascularization: is this as good as it gets?
    Armstrong PW
    CMAJ; 1998 Aug; 159(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 9724977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The improving outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Ontario, 1981 to 1995.
    Tu JV; Wu K
    CMAJ; 1998 Aug; 159(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9724975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of definition of mortality on hospital profiles.
    Johnson ML; Gordon HS; Petersen NJ; Wray NP; Shroyer AL; Grover FL; Geraci JM
    Med Care; 2002 Jan; 40(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 11748422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines).
    Parikh SV; de Lemos JA; Jessen ME; Brilakis ES; Ohman EM; Chen AY; Wang TY; Peterson ED; Roe MT; Holper EM;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Apr; 3(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 20398870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential time trends of outcomes and costs of care for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations by ST elevation and type of intervention in the United States, 2001-2011.
    Sugiyama T; Hasegawa K; Kobayashi Y; Takahashi O; Fukui T; Tsugawa Y
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2015 Mar; 4(3):e001445. PubMed ID: 25801759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac study shows wide performance gaps.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 2001 Sep; 8(9):100-2, 97. PubMed ID: 11561376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top hospitals record a 71% lower mortality rate.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Dec; 14(12):141-3. PubMed ID: 18019791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking the vital risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery in Ontario.
    Naylor CD; Szalai JP; Katic M
    CMAJ; 2000 Mar; 162(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 10750462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is it time to reassess the optimal timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction?
    Boden WE
    Am J Cardiol; 2002 Jul; 90(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12088776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The inverse relationship between mortality rates and performance in the Hospital Quality Alliance measures.
    Jha AK; Orav EJ; Li Z; Epstein AM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(4):1104-10. PubMed ID: 17630453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bypass surgery after non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction better early than late?
    Anderson JL; Doty JR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Apr; 3(4):428-30. PubMed ID: 20398871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery: do we have the answer and what about the future?
    Dehmer GJ; Kutcher MA
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(6):497-9. PubMed ID: 20031765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial.
    Tu JV; Donovan LR; Lee DS; Wang JT; Austin PC; Alter DA; Ko DT
    JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(21):2330-7. PubMed ID: 19923205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery with quality of care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines.
    Kim MS; Wang TY; Ou FS; Klein AJ; Hudson PA; Messenger JC; Masoudi FA; Rumsfeld JS; Ho PM
    Am Heart J; 2010 Nov; 160(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 21095285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of benchmarking projects on outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: challenges and prospects regarding the quality improvement initiative.
    Miyata H; Motomura N; Murakami A; Takamoto S;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 143(6):1364-9. PubMed ID: 22595627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the New York State experience.
    Hannan EL; Zhong Y; Racz M; Jacobs AK; Walford G; Cozzens K; Holmes DR; Jones RH; Hibberd M; Doran D; Whalen D; King SB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 20031769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Round two for physician-specific data due in December.
    Malcolm JA
    Pa Med; 1993 Oct; 96(10):40. PubMed ID: 8255603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.