These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11749101)

  • 21. Barriers to timely mammography.
    Mastroberti M; Stein JE
    HMO Pract; 1996 Sep; 10(3):104-7. PubMed ID: 10160284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A community peer-volunteer telephone reminder call to increase breast cancer-screening attendance.
    Goelen G; De Clercq G; Hanssens S
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2010 Jul; 37(4):E312-7. PubMed ID: 20591795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women?
    Lipkus IM; Rimer BK; Halabi S; Strigo TS
    Am J Prev Med; 2000 Jan; 18(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10808977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles.
    Bastani R; Marcus AC; Maxwell AE; Das IP; Yan KX
    Prev Med; 1994 Jan; 23(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 8016038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial.
    Harrison RV; Janz NK; Wolfe RA; Tedeschi PJ; Chernew M; Stross JK; Huang X; McMahon LF
    Med Care; 2003 Mar; 41(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 12618641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan.
    Davis NA; Nash E; Bailey C; Lewis MJ; Rimer BK; Koplan JP
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 9236968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.
    Champion V; Skinner CS; Hui S; Monahan P; Juliar B; Daggy J; Menon U
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Mar; 65(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 17196358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conflicting national recommendations and the use of screening mammography: does the physician's recommendation matter?
    Taplin SH; Urban N; Taylor VM; Savarino J
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1997; 10(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 9071688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Underusers of mammogram screening: stage of adoption in five U.S. subpopulations. The NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.
    Stoddard AM; Rimer BK; Lane D; Fox SA; Lipkus I; Luckmann R; Avrunin JS; Sprachman S; Costanza M; Urban N
    Prev Med; 1998; 27(3):478-87. PubMed ID: 9612839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing Telephone Counseling With Reminding to Promote On-Time Repeated Mammography: A Randomized Trial in a Cohort With 4 Years Follow-Up.
    Costanza ME; Luckmann R; Frisard C; White MJ; Cranos C
    Health Educ Behav; 2020 Feb; 47(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 31760817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women.
    Fox SA; Murata PJ; Stein JA
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Jan; 151(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 1985609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a media-based mammography program.
    Mayer JA; Kossman MK; Miller LC; Crooks CE; Slymen DJ; Lee CD
    Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 1575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodology for targeting physicians for interventions to improve breast cancer screening.
    Lane DS; Messina CR
    Am J Prev Med; 1999 May; 16(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 10493284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality control in a National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: women's satisfaction with the mammography process.
    Almog R; Hagoel L; Tamir A; Barnett O; Rennert G
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18319148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Church-based telephone mammography counseling with peer counselors.
    Derose KP; Fox SA; Reigadas E; Hawes-Dawson J
    J Health Commun; 2000; 5(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 11010348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast and cervical cancer screening in obese minority women.
    Ferrante JM; Chen PH; Jacobs A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Jun; 15(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 16796480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies.
    JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 2355430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
    Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Promoting cancer screening among the first-degree relatives of breast and colorectal cancer patients: the design of two randomized trials.
    Marcus AC; Ahnen D; Cutter G; Calonge N; Russell S; Sedlacek SM; Wood M; Manchester D; Fox L; McCaskill-Stevens W; Fairclough D; Hines S; Wenzel L; Osborn K
    Prev Med; 1999 Mar; 28(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 10072740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.