BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11752939)

  • 1. Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.
    Park SB; Kim JK; Choi SH; Noh HN; Ji EK; Cho KS
    Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11752939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
    Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
    Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasonography: comparison of height obtained by use of transaxial and midsagittal scanning.
    Kim SB; Cho IC; Min SK
    Korean J Urol; 2014 Jul; 55(7):470-4. PubMed ID: 25045446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
    Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Lee JS; Chung BH
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate cancer volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in order to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Konyalioglu E; Tarhan H; Cakmak O; Pala EE; Zorlu F
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 26200537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Myschetzky PS; Suburu RE; Kelly BS; Wilson ML; Chen SC; Lee F
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():107-11. PubMed ID: 1947827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
    Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
    Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of PSA density by 3 imaging modalities and its correlation with the PSA density of radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Varkarakis I; Zarkadoulias A; Bourdoumis A; Chatzidarellis E; Antoniou N; Deliveliotis C
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1038-42. PubMed ID: 22196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Wolff JM; Boeckmann W; Mattelaer P; Handt S; Adam G; Jakse G
    Eur Urol; 1995; 28(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8521887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
    Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
    Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
    Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
    Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of measuring the prostatic transition zone: an anatomical and radiological study.
    Zlotta AR; Djavan B; Damoun M; Roumeguere T; Petein M; Entezari K; Marberger M; Schulman CC
    BJU Int; 1999 Oct; 84(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 10510112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of transrectal ultrasound scan of the prostate with sector biopsies for 323 New Zealand men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
    Smart R
    N Z Med J; 1999 Dec; 112(1101):465-9. PubMed ID: 10678211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Accuracy of prostatic ultrasonography versus MRI in measuring prostate volume].
    Hou JL; Ma WL; Dong X; Zhu XY; Zhang Q; Qiu XF; Zhuang JL; Huang HF; Guo HQ; Gan WD
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Oct; 28(10):896-900. PubMed ID: 37838956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts.
    Hong MK; Yao HH; Rzetelski-West K; Namdarian B; Pedersen J; Peters JS; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():57-63. PubMed ID: 22458496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy.
    Mazaheri Y; Goldman DA; Di Paolo PL; Akin O; Hricak H
    Acad Radiol; 2015 May; 22(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 25708867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy.
    Sajadi KP; Terris MK; Hamilton RJ; Cullen J; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):990-5. PubMed ID: 17632170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
    Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.