BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11752966)

  • 1. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
    Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.
    Han JK; Kim AY; Lee KY; Seo JB; Kim TK; Choi BI; Lhee CS; Han MC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An optimal contrast dose indicator for the determination of hepatic enhancement in abdominal multidetector computed tomography: comparison of patient attenuation indicator with total body weight and body mass index.
    Li J; Udayasankar UK; Tang X; Carew J; Toth TL; Small WC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 21084903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model.
    Garcia P; Genin G; Bret PM; Bonaldi VM; Reinhold C; Atri M
    Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 10525816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
    Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
    Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of two injection protocols by time-density curves for possible application to hepatic dynamic and upper abdominal CT angiography in MDCT: high concentration (350 mgI/ml) with conventional volume (100 ml) vs. conventional concentration (300 mgI/ml) with larger volume (150 ml) and higher injection rate].
    Matoba M; Yokota H; Yabuno K; Kuga G; Tinami H; Yamamoto I
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Feb; 63(3):98-102. PubMed ID: 12692964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement.
    Kondo H; Kanematsu M; Goshima S; Miyoshi T; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 17312064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal arterial phase imaging for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma determined by continuous image capture on 16-MDCT.
    Ma X; Samir AE; Holalkere NS; Sahani DV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):772-7. PubMed ID: 18716108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiphase multislice spiral CT for liver assessment: optimization in cirrhotic patients.
    Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Carbone I; Ferrari R; Mangiapane F; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2002 Mar; 103(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 11976615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver by means of helical CT: comparison of different contrast medium concentrations within the same patient.
    Sultana S; Morishita S; Awai K; Kawanaka K; Ohyama Y; Nakayama Y; Imuta M; Arakawa A; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):239-45. PubMed ID: 14743896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model.
    Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):647-55. PubMed ID: 9609886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT of the abdomen: degree and quality of enhancement obtained with two concentrations of the same iodinated contrast medium with fixed iodine delivery rate and total iodine load.
    Paparo F; Garello I; Bacigalupo L; Marziano A; Galletto Pregliasco A; Rollandi L; Puppo C; Mattioli F; Puntoni M; Rollandi GA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 83(11):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 25174776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease.
    Furuta A; Ito K; Fujita T; Koike S; Shimizu A; Matsunaga N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 15208131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.
    Awai K; Inoue M; Yagyu Y; Watanabe M; Sano T; Nin S; Koike R; Nishimura Y; Yamashita Y
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.